Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1895: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.0724992894770213

Latest revision as of 11:54, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1895_CD4_CD14_spinal_Mast_Monocytederived_Fibroblast_thalamus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:225754019..225754024,-p@chr2:225754019..225754024
-
Hg19::chr2:225783727..225783744,-p@chr2:225783727..225783744
-
Hg19::chr2:225783980..225783992,-p@chr2:225783980..225783992
-
Hg19::chr2:225784564..225784582,-p@chr2:225784564..225784582
-
Hg19::chr2:225784594..225784609,-p@chr2:225784594..225784609
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
nongranular leukocyte4.07e-31115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.64e-30120
leukocyte1.79e-28136
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.72e-27161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.72e-27161
hematopoietic stem cell6.72e-27168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell6.72e-27168
hematopoietic cell1.81e-25177
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.31e-2067
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.82e-1966
defensive cell1.54e-1848
phagocyte1.54e-1848
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.15e-1861
monopoietic cell2.23e-1859
monocyte2.23e-1859
monoblast2.23e-1859
promonocyte2.23e-1859
classical monocyte5.37e-1742
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte5.37e-1742
myeloid leukocyte3.09e-1672
myeloid cell2.35e-15108
common myeloid progenitor2.35e-15108
mesenchymal cell3.07e-13354
connective tissue cell4.04e-12361
lymphocyte1.15e-1153
common lymphoid progenitor1.15e-1153
motile cell4.63e-11386
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.67e-1152
nucleate cell9.18e-1155
T cell2.18e-0825
pro-T cell2.18e-0825
mature alpha-beta T cell7.84e-0818
alpha-beta T cell7.84e-0818
immature T cell7.84e-0818
mature T cell7.84e-0818
immature alpha-beta T cell7.84e-0818
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system2.49e-2098
blood island2.49e-2098
bone marrow6.72e-1876
immune system1.13e-1793
hemolymphoid system1.32e-17108
bone element4.06e-1782
skeletal element8.57e-1490
skeletal system1.18e-13100
connective tissue1.89e-11371
neural tube1.22e-1056
neural rod1.22e-1056
future spinal cord1.22e-1056
neural keel1.22e-1056
regional part of nervous system4.40e-0953
regional part of brain4.40e-0953
brain grey matter1.66e-0834
gray matter1.66e-0834
telencephalon4.00e-0834
regional part of forebrain8.55e-0841
forebrain8.55e-0841
anterior neural tube8.55e-0841
future forebrain8.55e-0841
regional part of telencephalon1.88e-0732
neural nucleus3.39e-079
nucleus of brain3.39e-079
cerebral hemisphere4.98e-0732


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.00991994
MA0004.10.626788
MA0006.10.452993
MA0007.10.606704
MA0009.11.11255
MA0014.10.0418333
MA0017.10.496101
MA0019.10.784036
MA0024.11.00439
MA0025.11.24931
MA0027.12.73598
MA0028.10.470679
MA0029.11.02437
MA0030.11.01252
MA0031.10.945567
MA0038.10.736268
MA0040.11.03042
MA0041.10.64667
MA0042.10.612397
MA0043.11.11288
MA0046.11.10134
MA0048.10.569896
MA0050.10.613347
MA0051.10.731787
MA0052.11.03442
MA0055.10.288856
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.189508
MA0058.10.523638
MA0059.10.522232
MA0060.10.321781
MA0061.10.291022
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.736721
MA0067.11.43651
MA0068.10.247962
MA0069.11.09737
MA0070.11.08584
MA0071.10.695094
MA0072.11.0812
MA0073.114.4978
MA0074.10.730989
MA0076.10.540943
MA0077.11.07324
MA0078.10.836493
MA0081.10.522409
MA0083.11.12028
MA0084.11.62584
MA0087.11.07867
MA0088.10.132006
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.556637
MA0091.10.629594
MA0092.10.588959
MA0093.10.456342
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.750974
MA0101.10.459973
MA0103.10.442769
MA0105.10.175503
MA0106.10.779931
MA0107.10.378225
MA0108.20.94238
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.5713
MA0113.10.797251
MA0114.10.372523
MA0115.11.35895
MA0116.10.382106
MA0117.11.1512
MA0119.10.504689
MA0122.11.17777
MA0124.11.31673
MA0125.11.23103
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.855546
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.14377
MA0136.10.743749
MA0139.10.277033
MA0140.10.692258
MA0141.10.520334
MA0142.10.912455
MA0143.10.797437
MA0144.10.356507
MA0145.10.442008
MA0146.10.0359558
MA0147.10.386018
MA0148.10.653474
MA0149.10.681935
MA0062.20.284987
MA0035.20.691506
MA0039.20.0118463
MA0138.20.837782
MA0002.20.83106
MA0137.20.47779
MA0104.20.320919
MA0047.20.767096
MA0112.20.136971
MA0065.20.146576
MA0150.10.550239
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.69926
MA0153.11.21379
MA0154.10.172764
MA0155.10.130813
MA0156.10.480289
MA0157.10.883854
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.386729
MA0160.10.669748
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0592265
MA0163.10.0439995
MA0164.10.810347
MA0080.20.456437
MA0018.20.781393
MA0099.20.699641
MA0079.23.83292e-05
MA0102.21.66336
MA0258.10.345771
MA0259.10.395396
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C1895&oldid=3069012"