Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1231

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:08, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1231_Melanocyte_Mallassezderived_Gingival_Keratinocyte_melanoma_Sebocyte_Mesenchymal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:74524635..74524670,-p@chr17:74524635..74524670
-
Hg19::chr17:74533734..74533758,-p2@CYGB
Hg19::chr17:74533763..74533773,-p5@CYGB
Hg19::chr17:74533781..74533800,-p1@CYGB
Hg19::chr17:74533963..74533981,-p3@CYGB
Hg19::chr17:74534001..74534013,-p4@CYGB
Hg19::chr17:74534029..74534039,-p6@CYGB


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision9.04e-24365
cell layer5.47e-22312
epithelium2.29e-21309
multi-tissue structure2.97e-21347
multi-cellular organism1.72e-17659
trunk mesenchyme1.36e-15143
multilaminar epithelium2.13e-1582
somite2.11e-1483
paraxial mesoderm2.11e-1483
presomitic mesoderm2.11e-1483
presumptive segmental plate2.11e-1483
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.11e-1483
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.11e-1483
trunk4.10e-13216
embryo5.14e-13612
anatomical system5.53e-13625
anatomical cluster8.14e-13286
anatomical group1.01e-12626
adult organism1.24e-12115
muscle tissue2.97e-1263
musculature2.97e-1263
musculature of body2.97e-1263
dermomyotome4.05e-1270
embryonic structure4.07e-12605
developing anatomical structure4.07e-12605
germ layer5.25e-12604
embryonic tissue5.25e-12604
presumptive structure5.25e-12604
epiblast (generic)5.25e-12604
compound organ6.63e-1269
skeletal muscle tissue1.41e-1161
striated muscle tissue1.41e-1161
myotome1.41e-1161
anatomical conduit1.62e-11241
primary circulatory organ5.01e-1027
ectoderm-derived structure1.81e-09169
organ part2.99e-09219
ectoderm3.63e-09173
presumptive ectoderm3.63e-09173
mesenchyme5.54e-09238
entire embryonic mesenchyme5.54e-09238
heart7.22e-0924
primitive heart tube7.22e-0924
primary heart field7.22e-0924
anterior lateral plate mesoderm7.22e-0924
heart tube7.22e-0924
heart primordium7.22e-0924
cardiac mesoderm7.22e-0924
cardiogenic plate7.22e-0924
heart rudiment7.22e-0924
head1.20e-08123
anterior region of body2.68e-08129
craniocervical region2.68e-08129
tube3.34e-08194
organ1.05e-07511
neural plate1.58e-0786
presumptive neural plate1.58e-0786
neurectoderm4.18e-0790
tissue4.74e-07787
surface structure5.05e-0795


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.