Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3948

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:32, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3948_stomach_colon_temporal_MCF7_rectum_duodenum_small



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:230883128..230883162,+p1@CAPN9
Hg19::chr20:52687059..52687143,-p3@BCAS1
Hg19::chr8:124926807..124926826,+p@chr8:124926807..124926826
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004198calcium-dependent cysteine-type endopeptidase activity0.0423697562139279



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endo-epithelial cell4.88e-1042
endodermal cell1.46e-0858
epithelial cell of prostate2.92e-083
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
subdivision of digestive tract7.11e-20118
endoderm-derived structure1.78e-19160
endoderm1.78e-19160
presumptive endoderm1.78e-19160
digestive system6.15e-19145
digestive tract6.15e-19145
primitive gut6.15e-19145
intestine2.85e-1417
gastrointestinal system2.05e-1325
adult organism1.44e-12114
organ system subdivision4.35e-12223
hindgut6.42e-1219
orifice1.10e-1036
large intestine6.61e-0911
cloaca4.29e-0814
anal region4.29e-0814
embryonic cloaca4.29e-0814
terminal part of digestive tract4.29e-0814
primitive urogenital sinus4.29e-0814
proctodeum4.29e-0814
respiratory system8.19e-0874
colon9.35e-089
genitourinary system1.75e-0715
intermediate mesoderm2.90e-0728
open tracheal system trachea6.49e-072
multi-tissue structure7.37e-07342


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.