Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2353

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:20, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr2:9789180..9789184,-p@chr2:9789180..9789184
-
Mm9::chr2:9799511..9799514,-p@chr2:9799511..9799514
-
Mm9::chr2:9800094..9800108,-p3@Gata3
Mm9::chr2:9800207..9800234,-p1@Gata3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure1.66e-1035
renal system4.36e-1019
urinary system structure4.72e-1018
anterior region of body8.67e-1043
thymus2.00e-0923
neck2.00e-0923
respiratory system epithelium2.00e-0923
hemolymphoid system gland2.00e-0923
pharyngeal epithelium2.00e-0923
thymic region2.00e-0923
pharyngeal gland2.00e-0923
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm2.00e-0923
thymus primordium2.00e-0923
early pharyngeal endoderm2.00e-0923
gland of gut8.01e-0924
pharynx1.12e-0824
upper respiratory tract1.12e-0824
chordate pharynx1.12e-0824
pharyngeal arch system1.12e-0824
pharyngeal region of foregut1.12e-0824
craniocervical region1.17e-0836
hemopoietic organ1.17e-0829
immune organ1.17e-0829
organism subdivision3.57e-08150
kidney1.90e-0714
kidney mesenchyme1.90e-0714
upper urinary tract1.90e-0714
kidney rudiment1.90e-0714
kidney field1.90e-0714
respiratory tract7.33e-0741


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}