Template:Novel motif: Difference between revisions
From FANTOM5_SSTAR
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
table.details th { width:10%; background-color: #5A5FB5; color: white;} | table.details th { width:10%; background-color: #5A5FB5; color: white;} | ||
</style> | </style> | ||
<script type="text/javascript" src="/5/sstar/rb_js/jquery-1.7.1.min.js"></script> | |||
<script type="text/javascript" src="/5/sstar/rb_js/html5button/datatables.js"></script> | <script type="text/javascript" src="/5/sstar/rb_js/html5button/datatables.js"></script> | ||
<script type="text/javascript" src="/5/sstar/rb_js/custom/convert.js"></script> | <script type="text/javascript" src="/5/sstar/rb_js/custom/convert.js"></script> |
Revision as of 15:59, 17 January 2020
name: | {{{name}}} |
---|
Association to promoter expression in human samples<b>Summary:</b>Significance of the correlation with CAGE expression, human <br><b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data
Association to promoter expression in mouse samples
<b>Summary:</b>Significance of the correlation with CAGE expression, mouse <br><b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data
GREAT analysis results for human
<b>Summary:</b>Genomic Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT, Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):495-501) is used to identify, both in human and in mouse, the gene ontology terms of biological processes enriched given the predicted TFBSs, and evaluated the overlap in the top-500 gene ontology terms between human and mouse. For each novel motif, the P value for the overlap was then evaluated by calculating its relative rank with respect to this background distribution.<br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data
GO ID | GO Term | p-value |
---|---|---|
{{{great_results_human}}} |
GREAT analysis results for mouseGenomic Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT, Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):495-501) is used to identify, both in human and in mouse, the gene ontology terms of biological processes enriched given the predicted TFBSs, and evaluated the overlap in the top-500 gene ontology terms between human and mouse. For each novel motif, the P value for the overlap was then evaluated by calculating its relative rank with respect to this background distribution.<br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source dataset <br>data
GO ID | GO Term | p-value |
---|---|---|
{{{great_results_mouse}}} |