Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1544

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:03, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:103196642..103196648,-p@chr11:103196642..103196648
-
Mm9::chr1:172909896..172909901,+p@chr1:172909896..172909901
+
Mm9::chr9:69883363..69883381,-p@chr9:69883363..69883381
-
Mm9::chr9:69884617..69884624,-p@chr9:69884617..69884624
-
Mm9::chr9:69884625..69884648,-p@chr9:69884625..69884648
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
gastrointestinal system2.16e-2547
intestine6.30e-1931
mucosa1.60e-0915
digestive system2.84e-09116
digestive tract2.84e-09116
primitive gut2.84e-09116
endoderm-derived structure5.48e-09118
endoderm5.48e-09118
presumptive endoderm5.48e-09118
small intestine9.04e-094
subdivision of digestive tract7.32e-08114
stomach3.42e-0716
food storage organ3.42e-0716
ileal mucosa4.49e-073
ileum4.49e-073
mucosa of small intestine4.49e-073
wall of small intestine4.49e-073
intestinal mucosa6.87e-0713
anatomical wall6.87e-0713
wall of intestine6.87e-0713
gastrointestinal system mucosa6.87e-0713


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}