Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4569

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:03, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4569_placenta_mesothelioma_liposarcoma_rectal_prostate_Intestinal_adrenal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:142623708..142623713,+p8@GPR126
Hg19::chr6:142623784..142623795,+p5@GPR126
Hg19::chr6:142623806..142623820,+p2@GPR126


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell1.34e-31253
endodermal cell3.41e-1458
mesothelial cell2.27e-1119
squamous epithelial cell1.02e-1063
endo-epithelial cell5.25e-0942
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure1.41e-24160
endoderm1.41e-24160
presumptive endoderm1.41e-24160
subdivision of digestive tract3.21e-22118
digestive system9.87e-21145
digestive tract9.87e-21145
primitive gut9.87e-21145
foregut5.21e-1887
endo-epithelium2.89e-1782
gut epithelium3.51e-1254
respiratory tract1.39e-1154
trunk region element1.65e-11101
gland3.42e-1159
respiratory system7.51e-1174
organ system subdivision7.33e-10223
immaterial anatomical entity9.89e-10117
sac1.23e-0926
epithelial bud2.70e-0937
epithelial sac4.03e-0925
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction1.16e-0825
anatomical boundary1.16e-0825
hepatobiliary system1.16e-0825
foregut-midgut junction1.16e-0825
septum transversum1.16e-0825
organism subdivision4.69e-08264
subdivision of trunk5.94e-08112
segment of respiratory tract8.69e-0847
digestive tract diverticulum9.92e-0823
respiratory primordium1.55e-0738
endoderm of foregut1.55e-0738
exocrine gland2.53e-0731
exocrine system2.53e-0731
intermediate mesoderm3.12e-0728
hepatic diverticulum3.13e-0722
liver primordium3.13e-0722
epithelial fold3.16e-0747
hindgut3.49e-0719
orifice5.37e-0736
endocrine system6.40e-0745
endocrine gland7.05e-0735
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma1.13e-22106
cell type cancer5.23e-20143
cancer1.04e-11235
disease of cellular proliferation5.67e-11239
squamous cell carcinoma6.76e-0714


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105137.971147625824820.001974187055288560.0115689665507396
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0327353059450372
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.016826152278777
FOXA1#3169311.08141974938550.000734755275698670.0058368529884151
FOXA2#3170324.63046375266526.68983856509345e-050.00107621695918021
GATA3#2625327.2365163572064.94721007899563e-050.00085430170873053
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0295820349782445
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00618412188201257



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.