Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1267

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:41, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1267_bile_placenta_lung_iPS_H9_clear_melanoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:189156638..189156667,+p3@GULP1
Hg19::chr2:189157512..189157527,+p6@GULP1
Hg19::chr2:189157536..189157565,+p1@GULP1
Hg19::chr2:189157571..189157576,+p13@GULP1
Hg19::chr2:189157579..189157590,+p9@GULP1
Hg19::chr2:189157647..189157656,+p12@GULP1
Hg19::chr2:189157781..189157803,+p10@GULP1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
columnar/cuboidal epithelial cell3.10e-0727
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cloaca8.52e-0814
anal region8.52e-0814
embryonic cloaca8.52e-0814
terminal part of digestive tract8.52e-0814
primitive urogenital sinus8.52e-0814
proctodeum8.52e-0814
reproductive structure2.21e-0759
reproductive system2.21e-0759
genitourinary system5.18e-0715
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer9.20e-10143
carcinoma2.34e-08106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0137961
MA0004.10.502801
MA0006.10.904424
MA0007.10.483857
MA0009.10.973289
MA0014.12.12603
MA0017.10.380797
MA0019.10.652951
MA0024.10.867125
MA0025.11.10816
MA0027.12.59001
MA0028.10.940207
MA0029.10.886702
MA0030.10.875089
MA0031.10.809638
MA0038.10.60704
MA0040.10.892629
MA0041.10.521615
MA0042.10.48922
MA0043.10.973609
MA0046.10.962263
MA0048.10.120314
MA0050.10.490116
MA0051.10.602745
MA0052.10.896548
MA0055.11.01052
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.369442
MA0058.10.406232
MA0059.12.75581
MA0060.10.224688
MA0061.10.198335
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.607474
MA0067.11.29359
MA0068.10.162298
MA0069.10.958358
MA0070.10.947018
MA0071.10.567661
MA0072.10.942461
MA0073.10.065183
MA0074.10.60198
MA0076.10.422297
MA0077.10.934645
MA0078.10.703614
MA0081.10.405093
MA0083.10.980893
MA0084.11.48179
MA0087.10.939982
MA0088.10.0723293
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.436918
MA0091.10.505453
MA0092.10.467172
MA0093.10.344385
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.621149
MA0101.10.347695
MA0103.10.332048
MA0105.10.104569
MA0106.10.648997
MA0107.10.274127
MA0108.20.806528
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.45062
MA0113.10.665691
MA0114.10.269076
MA0115.11.21667
MA0116.12.97215
MA0117.11.01134
MA0119.10.388712
MA0122.11.03753
MA0124.11.17486
MA0125.11.0901
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.722072
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.00402
MA0136.10.614215
MA0139.11.04496
MA0140.10.564957
MA0141.10.403171
MA0142.10.777365
MA0143.10.66587
MA0144.10.254954
MA0145.12.62526
MA0146.10.547931
MA0147.10.281049
MA0148.10.528066
MA0149.10.555119
MA0062.20.193221
MA0035.20.564239
MA0039.20.243958
MA0138.20.704862
MA0002.20.213296
MA0137.20.36398
MA0104.20.223944
MA0047.20.636643
MA0112.21.95102
MA0065.20.0828768
MA0150.10.430951
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.571637
MA0153.11.07307
MA0154.10.335384
MA0155.10.910701
MA0156.10.36627
MA0157.10.749547
MA0158.10
MA0159.14.89834
MA0160.10.543522
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.106355
MA0163.10.0167306
MA0164.10.678332
MA0080.20.344472
MA0018.20.650405
MA0099.20.572
MA0079.21.1389
MA0102.21.51913
MA0258.10.245543
MA0259.10.289405
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186974.907389214879321.45832274679793e-050.000346858960038326
E2F6#187675.017155731697391.24910426162553e-050.000308186156342803
FOXA1#316946.332239856791690.001854681016920170.010944179373192
HEY1#2346263.462952322662040.001267890095872120.00850627440886419
POLR2A#543072.147453176558070.004747636447610280.0223552030185739
RAD21#5885710.35503389545637.82487927673307e-084.69938221266662e-06
REST#597868.271453185252597.89289295030691e-060.000222911261989482
SIN3A#2594264.636186908698690.0002351678146357830.00256669363494059
TAF1#687273.343046285745290.0002142336319622450.00246794024801511
TAF7#687969.799773775649072.89681485118392e-069.95198836324991e-05
TBP#690873.706770687096390.0001039672097505110.00145202345802804
TCF7L2#6934710.77017656313735.9423478161588e-083.69632438101137e-06



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C1267&oldid=3068384"