Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2717: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
|gostat_on_coexpression_clusters=GO:0047372!acylglycerol lipase activity!0.000824208171435299!11343$GO:0004622!lysophospholipase activity!0.00185446838572942!11343$GO:0004620!phospholipase activity!0.0145266690215472!11343$GO:0016298!lipase activity!0.0145266690215472!11343$GO:0004091!carboxylesterase activity!0.0154126928058401!11343$GO:0006954!inflammatory response!0.019987048157306!11343$GO:0009611!response to wounding!0.0249028611797951!11343$GO:0006952!defense response!0.028984654028808!11343$GO:0009605!response to external stimulus!0.028984654028808!11343$GO:0006629!lipid metabolic process!0.0389850465088896!11343$GO:0016788!hydrolase activity, acting on ester bonds!0.041965932728914!11343$GO:0006950!response to stress!0.041965932728914!11343
|gostat_on_coexpression_clusters=GO:0047372!acylglycerol lipase activity!0.000824208171435299!11343$GO:0004622!lysophospholipase activity!0.00185446838572942!11343$GO:0004620!phospholipase activity!0.0145266690215472!11343$GO:0016298!lipase activity!0.0145266690215472!11343$GO:0004091!carboxylesterase activity!0.0154126928058401!11343$GO:0006954!inflammatory response!0.019987048157306!11343$GO:0009611!response to wounding!0.0249028611797951!11343$GO:0006952!defense response!0.028984654028808!11343$GO:0009605!response to external stimulus!0.028984654028808!11343$GO:0006629!lipid metabolic process!0.0389850465088896!11343$GO:0016788!hydrolase activity, acting on ester bonds!0.041965932728914!11343$GO:0006950!response to stress!0.041965932728914!11343
|id=C2717
|id=C2717
|ontology_enrichment_celltype=CL:0002087!1.05e-29!119;CL:0000738!6.17e-29!140;CL:0000037!1.36e-25!172;CL:0000566!1.36e-25!172;CL:0002031!2.45e-24!124;CL:0000988!1.17e-23!182;CL:0002009!1.35e-23!65;CL:0002194!2.24e-23!63;CL:0000576!2.24e-23!63;CL:0000040!2.24e-23!63;CL:0000559!2.24e-23!63;CL:0002032!6.32e-22!165;CL:0000837!6.32e-22!165;CL:0000557!1.91e-20!71;CL:0000839!1.05e-19!70;CL:0000766!4.04e-17!76;CL:0000763!2.04e-15!112;CL:0000049!2.04e-15!112;CL:0002057!2.97e-15!42;CL:0000860!1.08e-14!45;CL:0000945!3.57e-09!24;CL:0000826!3.57e-09!24;CL:0000451!4.11e-09!10
|ontology_enrichment_disease=DOID:0060058!3.31e-08!10;DOID:2531!5.45e-07!51;DOID:0060083!5.45e-07!51
|ontology_enrichment_uberon=UBERON:0002390!1.84e-20!102;UBERON:0003061!1.84e-20!102;UBERON:0002405!2.38e-19!115;UBERON:0002193!2.57e-19!112;UBERON:0002371!6.49e-19!80;UBERON:0001474!1.81e-17!86;UBERON:0004765!1.40e-13!101;UBERON:0001434!1.40e-13!101;UBERON:0007023!6.36e-12!115;UBERON:0004177!8.09e-07!7
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:27, 21 May 2012


Full id: C2717_acute_B_xeroderma_b_splenic_plasma_Dendritic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:127454947..127454961,-p16@MGLL
Hg19::chr3:127454965..127454984,-p27@MGLL
Hg19::chr3:174988853..174988868,-p1@NAALADL2-AS2
Hg19::chr7:150130832..150130852,+p2@ENST00000486954


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0047372acylglycerol lipase activity0.000824208171435299
GO:0004622lysophospholipase activity0.00185446838572942
GO:0004620phospholipase activity0.0145266690215472
GO:0016298lipase activity0.0145266690215472
GO:0004091carboxylesterase activity0.0154126928058401
GO:0006954inflammatory response0.019987048157306
GO:0009611response to wounding0.0249028611797951
GO:0006952defense response0.028984654028808
GO:0009605response to external stimulus0.028984654028808
GO:0006629lipid metabolic process0.0389850465088896
GO:0016788hydrolase activity, acting on ester bonds0.041965932728914
GO:0006950response to stress0.041965932728914



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
nongranular leukocyte1.05e-29119
leukocyte6.17e-29140
hematopoietic stem cell1.36e-25172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.36e-25172
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.45e-24124
hematopoietic cell1.17e-23182
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.35e-2365
monopoietic cell2.24e-2363
monocyte2.24e-2363
monoblast2.24e-2363
promonocyte2.24e-2363
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.32e-22165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.32e-22165
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.91e-2071
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.05e-1970
myeloid leukocyte4.04e-1776
myeloid cell2.04e-15112
common myeloid progenitor2.04e-15112
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.97e-1542
classical monocyte1.08e-1445
lymphocyte of B lineage3.57e-0924
pro-B cell3.57e-0924
dendritic cell4.11e-0910
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.84e-20102
blood island1.84e-20102
immune system2.38e-19115
hemolymphoid system2.57e-19112
bone marrow6.49e-1980
bone element1.81e-1786
skeletal element1.40e-13101
skeletal system1.40e-13101
adult organism6.36e-12115
hemopoietic organ8.09e-077
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
lymphoma3.31e-0810
hematologic cancer5.45e-0751
immune system cancer5.45e-0751


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.