Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3780: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0,

Latest revision as of 12:32, 17 September 2013


Full id: C3780_submaxillary_salivary_small_parotid_duodenum_colon_gall



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:3708338..3708374,+p2@TJP3
Hg19::chr19:3708376..3708393,+p3@TJP3
Hg19::chr19:49199209..49199284,+p1@FUT2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0008107galactoside 2-alpha-L-fucosyltransferase activity0.00835945660815558
GO:0031127alpha(1,2)-fucosyltransferase activity0.00835945660815558
GO:0019317fucose catabolic process0.00919445483353814
GO:0042355L-fucose catabolic process0.00919445483353814
GO:0042354L-fucose metabolic process0.00919445483353814
GO:0006004fucose metabolic process0.010447628911207
GO:0008417fucosyltransferase activity0.0107456579977852
GO:0030173integral to Golgi membrane0.031843689414368
GO:0031228intrinsic to Golgi membrane0.032477416739505
GO:0005923tight junction0.0347950932244708
GO:0043296apical junction complex0.0347950932244708
GO:0016327apicolateral plasma membrane0.0347950932244708
GO:0031301integral to organelle membrane0.0347950932244708
GO:0031300intrinsic to organelle membrane0.0347950932244708
GO:0019320hexose catabolic process0.0347950932244708
GO:0046365monosaccharide catabolic process0.0347950932244708
GO:0046164alcohol catabolic process0.0347950932244708
GO:0005911intercellular junction0.0347950932244708
GO:0006486protein amino acid glycosylation0.0347950932244708
GO:0043413biopolymer glycosylation0.0347950932244708
GO:0009101glycoprotein biosynthetic process0.0347950932244708
GO:0044275cellular carbohydrate catabolic process0.0347950932244708
GO:0016052carbohydrate catabolic process0.0347950932244708
GO:0009100glycoprotein metabolic process0.0361155414592229
GO:0019318hexose metabolic process0.0433227771314757
GO:0005996monosaccharide metabolic process0.0433227771314757
GO:0016758transferase activity, transferring hexosyl groups0.0433227771314757



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endodermal cell2.29e-1558
epithelial cell2.93e-10253
endo-epithelial cell4.18e-1042
epithelial cell of alimentary canal8.69e-0720
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
subdivision of digestive tract7.24e-36118
digestive system3.69e-33145
digestive tract3.69e-33145
primitive gut3.69e-33145
endoderm-derived structure9.43e-32160
endoderm9.43e-32160
presumptive endoderm9.43e-32160
foregut3.77e-2587
immaterial anatomical entity1.70e-16117
organ system subdivision6.57e-16223
respiratory system5.69e-1574
respiratory tract1.74e-1354
gastrointestinal system1.17e-1225
adult organism1.53e-12114
trunk region element2.35e-12101
anatomical space4.96e-1295
endo-epithelium2.82e-1182
multi-tissue structure1.01e-10342
respiratory primordium1.11e-1038
endoderm of foregut1.11e-1038
intestine3.19e-1017
subdivision of trunk3.46e-10112
segment of respiratory tract1.49e-0947
organ1.19e-08503
thoracic cavity element1.52e-0834
thoracic cavity1.52e-0834
gland1.86e-0859
organism subdivision2.51e-08264
anatomical cluster3.15e-08373
thoracic segment organ3.69e-0835
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction3.75e-0825
anatomical boundary3.75e-0825
hepatobiliary system3.75e-0825
foregut-midgut junction3.75e-0825
septum transversum3.75e-0825
gut epithelium3.80e-0854
thoracic segment of trunk8.03e-0852
primordium1.50e-07160
organ segment2.35e-0798
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma9.47e-26106
cell type cancer2.84e-15143
adenocarcinoma5.64e-1125


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0471418
MA0004.11.93041
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.377374
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.557638
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.886807
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.11.04561
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.12.8848
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.12.626
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.846801
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.107247
MA0147.11.38767
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.757898
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.22.08438
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.21.2307
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.12.37721
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.149099
MA0163.10.122425
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.69213
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.11.29138
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BHLHE40#8553229.91454236465160.001467483527106140.0093968431690643



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C3780&oldid=3070897"