Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4600

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:50, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4600_heart_chorionic_Endothelial_Sertoli_Intestinal_Ewing_hepatic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:3912207..3912217,-p3@BX647262
Hg19::chr6:3912225..3912249,-p1@BX647262
Hg19::chr6:3912262..3912280,-p2@BX647262


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial tube9.66e-22118
anatomical conduit2.19e-15241
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm4.76e-1584
tube4.87e-14194
anatomical cluster1.35e-13286
simple squamous epithelium1.76e-1322
vessel1.28e-1269
cell layer2.63e-12312
vasculature3.82e-1279
vascular system3.82e-1279
circulatory system4.81e-12113
endothelium8.71e-1218
blood vessel endothelium8.71e-1218
cardiovascular system endothelium8.71e-1218
epithelium9.55e-12309
unilaminar epithelium1.81e-11138
squamous epithelium1.94e-1125
cardiovascular system9.58e-11110
blood vessel5.21e-1060
epithelial tube open at both ends5.21e-1060
blood vasculature5.21e-1060
vascular cord5.21e-1060
multi-cellular organism8.67e-10659
extraembryonic membrane1.36e-0814
membranous layer1.36e-0814
anatomical system2.33e-08625
anatomical group3.19e-08626
endothelial tube1.14e-079
arterial system endothelium1.14e-079
endothelium of artery1.14e-079
primary circulatory organ2.00e-0727


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.