Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3845

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:23, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3845_ductus_seminal_smallcell_colon_epididymis_salivary_pancreas



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:1098252..1098265,+p@chr1:1098252..1098265
+
Hg19::chr1:1098315..1098328,+p@chr1:1098315..1098328
+
Hg19::chr3:121741065..121741106,-p1@ILDR1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endo-epithelial cell6.24e-2042
epithelial cell1.74e-16253
endodermal cell3.50e-1458
respiratory epithelial cell5.54e-0913
epithelial cell of alimentary canal7.18e-0920
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure7.96e-24160
endoderm7.96e-24160
presumptive endoderm7.96e-24160
digestive system3.61e-22145
digestive tract3.61e-22145
primitive gut3.61e-22145
subdivision of digestive tract7.50e-18118
respiratory system7.17e-1474
anatomical space1.99e-1195
endo-epithelium4.43e-1182
orifice5.44e-1136
intestine2.62e-1017
gastrointestinal system2.65e-1025
trunk region element4.11e-10101
organism subdivision1.75e-09264
respiratory tract1.75e-0954
immaterial anatomical entity2.62e-09117
epithelial bud2.73e-0937
thoracic cavity element3.06e-0934
thoracic cavity3.06e-0934
renal system6.46e-0948
thoracic segment organ7.71e-0935
mucosa1.12e-0820
hindgut1.75e-0819
reproductive structure1.98e-0859
reproductive system1.98e-0859
urinary system structure3.41e-0847
lung3.83e-0822
respiratory tube3.83e-0822
respiration organ3.83e-0822
pair of lungs3.83e-0822
lung primordium3.83e-0822
lung bud3.83e-0822
epithelial fold4.82e-0847
thoracic segment of trunk6.76e-0852
subdivision of trunk7.58e-08112
organ1.03e-07503
foregut1.43e-0787
internal genitalia2.70e-0725
oral opening4.51e-0722
multi-tissue structure5.10e-07342
reproductive organ9.90e-0748
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma2.20e-18106
squamous cell carcinoma7.27e-1414
adenocarcinoma1.32e-1125
cell type cancer1.85e-11143
thoracic cancer4.16e-074
breast cancer4.16e-074


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ESR1#2099220.51240219743630.003099741577095180.0163098347811095



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.