Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C943

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:07, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C943_Mesenchymal_Preadipocyte_Fibroblast_Adipocyte_Synoviocyte_Hair_Mesothelial



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:13590619..13590632,+p2@FBLN2
Hg19::chr3:13590636..13590667,+p1@FBLN2
Hg19::chr3:13612049..13612061,+p@chr3:13612049..13612061
+
Hg19::chr3:13612234..13612246,+p@chr3:13612234..13612246
+
Hg19::chr3:13612256..13612291,+p@chr3:13612256..13612291
+
Hg19::chr3:13612325..13612337,+p@chr3:13612325..13612337
+
Hg19::chr3:13612343..13612379,+p@chr3:13612343..13612379
+
Hg19::chr3:13612408..13612437,+p@chr3:13612408..13612437
+
Hg19::chr3:13670704..13670708,+p@chr3:13670704..13670708
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
non-terminally differentiated cell1.31e-21180
fibroblast2.82e-1775
fat cell5.05e-1015
muscle precursor cell9.83e-1057
myoblast9.83e-1057
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell9.83e-1057
contractile cell1.23e-0959
muscle cell1.75e-0954
electrically responsive cell2.54e-0960
electrically active cell2.54e-0960
preadipocyte8.61e-0812
smooth muscle cell1.38e-0742
smooth muscle myoblast1.38e-0742
cardiocyte2.17e-0716
skin fibroblast2.92e-0723
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision2.04e-14365
primary circulatory organ1.67e-1127
dermomyotome2.52e-1170
muscle tissue6.53e-1163
musculature6.53e-1163
musculature of body6.53e-1163
heart8.22e-1124
primitive heart tube8.22e-1124
primary heart field8.22e-1124
anterior lateral plate mesoderm8.22e-1124
heart tube8.22e-1124
heart primordium8.22e-1124
cardiac mesoderm8.22e-1124
cardiogenic plate8.22e-1124
heart rudiment8.22e-1124
somite8.43e-1183
paraxial mesoderm8.43e-1183
presomitic mesoderm8.43e-1183
presumptive segmental plate8.43e-1183
trunk paraxial mesoderm8.43e-1183
presumptive paraxial mesoderm8.43e-1183
multi-tissue structure9.36e-11347
skeletal muscle tissue1.81e-1061
striated muscle tissue1.81e-1061
myotome1.81e-1061
multilaminar epithelium5.36e-1082
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm3.17e-0984
organ component layer8.30e-0957
adipose tissue1.23e-0814
surface structure2.50e-0895
multi-cellular organism3.45e-08659
trunk1.57e-07216
circulatory system3.24e-07113
trunk mesenchyme4.32e-07143
cell layer8.89e-07312


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066463.573504248716680.002103883629372150.0121665283703211
RAD21#588566.903355930304225.2568380699896e-050.000893585467434317



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.