Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2795

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:34, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2795_Fibroblast_Cardiac_Meningeal_Nucleus_lung_uterus_Skeletal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:70707556..70707558,-p@chr4:70707556..70707558
-
Hg19::chr4:70707608..70707615,-p@chr4:70707608..70707615
-
Hg19::chr4:70707689..70707711,-p@chr4:70707689..70707711
-
Hg19::chr4:70725856..70725871,-p1@SULT1E1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cell layer7.24e-27312
epithelium2.13e-25309
multi-tissue structure4.43e-22347
vasculature4.75e-1979
vascular system4.75e-1979
anatomical cluster1.39e-18286
unilaminar epithelium2.91e-18138
epithelial tube5.17e-18118
cardiovascular system7.58e-17110
anatomical conduit1.01e-16241
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm9.54e-1684
circulatory system1.07e-15113
tube1.71e-14194
embryo2.65e-14612
trunk mesenchyme1.94e-13143
embryonic structure3.02e-13605
developing anatomical structure3.02e-13605
artery4.36e-1342
arterial blood vessel4.36e-1342
arterial system4.36e-1342
muscle tissue7.65e-1363
musculature7.65e-1363
musculature of body7.65e-1363
germ layer8.67e-13604
embryonic tissue8.67e-13604
presumptive structure8.67e-13604
epiblast (generic)8.67e-13604
vessel1.32e-1269
blood vessel3.26e-1260
epithelial tube open at both ends3.26e-1260
blood vasculature3.26e-1260
vascular cord3.26e-1260
skeletal muscle tissue3.79e-1261
striated muscle tissue3.79e-1261
myotome3.79e-1261
organism subdivision8.20e-12365
multi-cellular organism1.30e-11659
somite2.55e-1183
paraxial mesoderm2.55e-1183
presomitic mesoderm2.55e-1183
presumptive segmental plate2.55e-1183
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.55e-1183
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.55e-1183
dermomyotome3.70e-1170
multilaminar epithelium1.13e-1082
mesenchyme4.21e-10238
entire embryonic mesenchyme4.21e-10238
anatomical system2.26e-09625
anatomical group3.03e-09626
trunk7.44e-09216
systemic artery1.01e-0833
systemic arterial system1.01e-0833
vasculature of head1.11e-0811
vasculature of organ1.11e-0811
exocrine gland2.55e-0731
exocrine system2.55e-0731


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.