Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1981

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:54, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1981_leiomyoma_Synoviocyte_Smooth_tenocyte_mesenchymal_Myoblast_meningioma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:86176947..86176961,+p@chr6:86176947..86176961
+
Hg19::chr6:86195012..86195030,+p8@NT5E
Hg19::chr6:86195088..86195100,+p9@NT5E
Hg19::chr6:86200265..86200276,+p@chr6:86200265..86200276
+
Hg19::chr6:86204178..86204193,+p@chr6:86204178..86204193
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multilaminar epithelium8.86e-1483
dense mesenchyme tissue5.97e-1373
somite1.17e-1271
presomitic mesoderm1.17e-1271
presumptive segmental plate1.17e-1271
dermomyotome1.17e-1271
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.17e-1271
paraxial mesoderm2.67e-1272
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.67e-1272
surface structure3.74e-1299
epithelial vesicle4.91e-1178
artery2.09e-1042
arterial blood vessel2.09e-1042
arterial system2.09e-1042
skeletal muscle tissue2.36e-1062
striated muscle tissue2.36e-1062
myotome2.36e-1062
muscle tissue1.07e-0964
musculature1.07e-0964
musculature of body1.07e-0964
trunk mesenchyme1.82e-08122
integument5.26e-0846
integumental system5.26e-0846
unilaminar epithelium5.50e-08148
skin of body6.07e-0841
vasculature8.88e-0878
vascular system8.88e-0878
systemic artery1.37e-0733
systemic arterial system1.37e-0733
vessel3.05e-0768
female organism7.30e-0741
epithelial tube open at both ends7.77e-0759
blood vessel7.77e-0759
blood vasculature7.77e-0759
vascular cord7.77e-0759
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer2.40e-1014
female reproductive organ cancer4.49e-0827
reproductive organ cancer3.81e-0729


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.