Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2406

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:59, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2406_Prostate_nasal_squamous_Urothelial_Small_Corneal_Keratinocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:39522081..39522118,-p@chr17:39522081..39522118
-
Hg19::chr1:200644175..200644191,+p@chr1:200644175..200644191
+
Hg19::chr1:209605592..209605601,+p4@MIR205HG
Hg19::chr6:47695497..47695505,-p@chr6:47695497..47695505
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endo-epithelial cell5.59e-3542
endodermal cell8.00e-2758
respiratory epithelial cell5.98e-2213
epithelial cell of alimentary canal1.68e-2020
epithelial cell4.97e-20253
squamous epithelial cell4.92e-1363
corneal epithelial cell2.66e-102
epithelial cell of tracheobronchial tree2.21e-089
epithelial cell of lower respiratory tract2.21e-089
general ecto-epithelial cell3.03e-0814
embryonic cell4.90e-08250
stratified squamous epithelial cell1.74e-076
keratin accumulating cell1.74e-076
stratified epithelial cell1.74e-076
keratinizing barrier epithelial cell1.74e-076
epithelial fate stem cell1.74e-076
stratified epithelial stem cell1.74e-076
surface ectodermal cell1.74e-076
duct epithelial cell3.89e-073
branched duct epithelial cell3.89e-073
tracheal epithelial cell3.89e-073
tracheoblast3.89e-073
gingival epithelial cell4.01e-073
acinar cell of salivary gland4.39e-073
bronchial epithelial cell4.82e-073
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
respiratory system2.47e-1274
mouth mucosa6.30e-1213
mucosa of oral region1.74e-104
respiratory system mucosa1.74e-104
oral opening3.46e-0922
endoderm-derived structure8.21e-09160
endoderm8.21e-09160
presumptive endoderm8.21e-09160
mouth9.35e-0929
stomodeum9.35e-0929
anterior region of body4.03e-0862
craniocervical region4.03e-0862
head9.94e-0856
mucosa1.51e-0720
subdivision of head2.05e-0749
surface structure3.33e-0799
neck3.50e-0710
gingival epithelium4.01e-073
lower respiratory tract epithelium4.82e-073
epithelium of bronchus4.82e-073
orifice6.36e-0736
respiratory tract8.44e-0754
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
squamous cell carcinoma6.44e-3114


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.