Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4638

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:06, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4638_CD4_testicular_H9_iPS_CD8_Natural_Basophils



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:105332361..105332378,-p10@ATXN7L1
Hg19::chr7:105332394..105332410,-p7@ATXN7L1
Hg19::chr7:105332434..105332443,-p11@ATXN7L1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br><br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
mature alpha-beta T cell9.57e-2718
alpha-beta T cell9.57e-2718
immature T cell9.57e-2718
mature T cell9.57e-2718
immature alpha-beta T cell9.57e-2718
leukocyte9.10e-20136
nongranular leukocyte3.05e-18115
T cell3.25e-1825
pro-T cell3.25e-1825
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell3.69e-176
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.74e-17120
intermediate monocyte1.03e-169
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte1.03e-169
embryonic stem cell1.04e-145
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell3.89e-1411
hematopoietic stem cell4.65e-14168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell4.65e-14168
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.59e-1452
lymphocyte1.50e-1353
common lymphoid progenitor1.50e-1353
nucleate cell7.08e-1355
hematopoietic cell7.72e-13177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell3.75e-12161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell3.75e-12161
naive T cell1.05e-093
natural killer cell6.09e-093
pro-NK cell6.09e-093
single nucleate cell1.46e-083
mononuclear cell1.46e-083
non-classical monocyte3.58e-083
CD14-low, CD16-positive monocyte3.58e-083
classical monocyte4.10e-0742
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.10e-0742
regulatory T cell4.24e-072
CD4-positive, CD25-positive, alpha-beta regulatory T cell4.24e-072
naive regulatory T cell4.24e-072
germ line cell5.06e-077
germ cell5.06e-077


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105137.971147625824820.001974187055288560.011577411526042
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0327547204640942
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0168379583295915
FOXA1#3169311.08141974938550.000734755275698670.00584040689844686
GATA3#2625327.2365163572064.94721007899563e-050.00085472567980186
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.02959516875225
SPI1#668838.204323508522730.001810593189410520.0109399214410671
TRIM28#10155318.59052504526250.0001555969297255280.00198054695229791
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0191098748477735
USF2#7392312.99219738506960.0004558979393427810.00423043313078816



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.