Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3089

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:23, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr17:31770048..31770097,-p@chr17:31770048..31770097
-
Mm9::chr17:31770099..31770121,-p@chr17:31770099..31770121
-
Mm9::chr17:31774080..31774130,-p1@Cbs


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
digestive tract diverticulum3.39e-1723
sac3.39e-1723
liver2.27e-1622
epithelial sac2.27e-1622
digestive gland2.27e-1622
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction2.27e-1622
anatomical boundary2.27e-1622
hepatobiliary system2.27e-1622
foregut-midgut junction2.27e-1622
hepatic diverticulum2.27e-1622
liver primordium2.27e-1622
septum transversum2.27e-1622
liver bud2.27e-1622
trunk region element1.70e-1579
exocrine gland2.55e-1325
exocrine system2.55e-1325
trunk6.04e-1390
abdomen element2.07e-1249
abdominal segment element2.07e-1249
abdominal segment of trunk2.07e-1249
abdomen2.07e-1249
pancreas3.55e-1112
subdivision of digestive tract3.77e-10114
immaterial anatomical entity6.26e-1079
digestive system1.19e-09116
digestive tract1.19e-09116
primitive gut1.19e-09116
endoderm-derived structure3.56e-09118
endoderm3.56e-09118
presumptive endoderm3.56e-09118
trunk mesenchyme5.35e-0945
gastrointestinal system9.19e-0947
subdivision of trunk1.59e-0866
endocrine system7.10e-0872
mesenchyme7.60e-0861
entire embryonic mesenchyme7.60e-0861
viscus3.87e-0719


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}