Coexpression cluster:C764

Full id: C764_Olfactory_Mesenchymal_Synoviocyte_Adipocyte_tenocyte_Chondrocyte_Multipotent

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:48244361..48244372,+	p3@EHD2
Hg19::chr19:48244802..48244816,+	p2@EHD2
Hg19::chr19:48244862..48244878,+	p3@AK301380
Hg19::chr19:48244887..48244893,+	p7@AK301380
Hg19::chr19:48244924..48244976,-	p2@CU677000
Hg19::chr19:48245099..48245147,-	p1@CU677000
Hg19::chr19:48245226..48245235,+	p5@AK301380
Hg19::chr19:48245284..48245309,+	p1@AK301380
Hg19::chr19:48245317..48245328,+	p6@AK301380
Hg19::chr19:48245342..48245364,+	p2@AK301380
Hg19::chr19:48245424..48245454,+	p4@AK301380

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

GO ID	GO name	FDR corrected p-value
GO:0030866	cortical actin cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis	0.0100965501000824
GO:0030865	cortical cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis	0.0100965501000824
GO:0019904	protein domain specific binding	0.0455146068003715
GO:0010324	membrane invagination	0.0455146068003715
GO:0006897	endocytosis	0.0455146068003715
GO:0030036	actin cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis	0.0455146068003715
GO:0030029	actin filament-based process	0.0455146068003715
GO:0003924	GTPase activity	0.0455146068003715
GO:0016044	membrane organization and biogenesis	0.0455146068003715

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
mesodermal cell	9.35e-21	121
fibroblast	3.98e-19	76
contractile cell	2.96e-16	59
embryonic cell	4.74e-16	250
muscle precursor cell	3.84e-15	58
myoblast	3.84e-15	58
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell	3.84e-15	58
muscle cell	9.30e-15	55
electrically responsive cell	2.31e-12	61
electrically active cell	2.31e-12	61
smooth muscle cell	4.54e-12	43
smooth muscle myoblast	4.54e-12	43
non-terminally differentiated cell	3.01e-11	106
somatic cell	2.09e-09	588
vascular associated smooth muscle cell	6.24e-08	32
lining cell	1.55e-07	58
barrier cell	1.55e-07	58
skin fibroblast	2.21e-07	23
preadipocyte	5.59e-07	12

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
epithelial vesicle	1.62e-19	78
multilaminar epithelium	1.06e-17	83
somite	7.13e-17	71
presomitic mesoderm	7.13e-17	71
presumptive segmental plate	7.13e-17	71
dermomyotome	7.13e-17	71
trunk paraxial mesoderm	7.13e-17	71
dense mesenchyme tissue	8.95e-17	73
paraxial mesoderm	1.97e-16	72
presumptive paraxial mesoderm	1.97e-16	72
mesenchyme	2.76e-16	160
entire embryonic mesenchyme	2.76e-16	160
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm	1.17e-15	83
trunk mesenchyme	1.32e-15	122
vasculature	2.54e-15	78
vascular system	2.54e-15	78
muscle tissue	3.43e-15	64
musculature	3.43e-15	64
musculature of body	3.43e-15	64
skeletal muscle tissue	3.71e-15	62
striated muscle tissue	3.71e-15	62
myotome	3.71e-15	62
organism subdivision	1.71e-14	264
surface structure	1.91e-14	99
unilaminar epithelium	5.96e-14	148
cell layer	2.98e-13	309
vessel	3.52e-13	68
epithelium	5.26e-13	306
epithelial tube	8.98e-13	117
epithelial tube open at both ends	1.17e-12	59
blood vessel	1.17e-12	59
blood vasculature	1.17e-12	59
vascular cord	1.17e-12	59
trunk	1.81e-12	199
multi-tissue structure	7.05e-12	342
multi-cellular organism	5.25e-11	656
artery	9.62e-11	42
arterial blood vessel	9.62e-11	42
arterial system	9.62e-11	42
cardiovascular system	3.80e-10	109
circulatory system	4.81e-10	112
integument	5.15e-10	46
integumental system	5.15e-10	46
anatomical system	2.58e-09	624
anatomical cluster	2.97e-09	373
anatomical group	4.32e-09	625
systemic artery	1.95e-08	33
systemic arterial system	1.95e-08	33
skin of body	4.67e-08	41
anatomical conduit	9.45e-08	240

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.