Coexpression cluster:C2440

Full id: C2440_CD14_lymphoma_migratory_CD19_b_splenic_immature

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:76732851..76732873,-	p4@CYTH1
Hg19::chr17:76732876..76732900,-	p5@CYTH1
Hg19::chr17:76732909..76732922,-	p7@CYTH1
Hg19::chr17:76732928..76732991,-	p2@CYTH1

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
leukocyte	3.29e-44	140
nongranular leukocyte	6.56e-35	119
hematopoietic stem cell	6.59e-35	172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell	6.59e-35	172
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell	1.45e-34	124
hematopoietic cell	3.99e-33	182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell	5.36e-33	165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell	5.36e-33	165
myeloid leukocyte	6.01e-24	76
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte	4.44e-22	42
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell	1.99e-21	71
classical monocyte	1.07e-20	45
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor	4.03e-20	65
monopoietic cell	5.41e-19	63
monocyte	5.41e-19	63
monoblast	5.41e-19	63
promonocyte	5.41e-19	63
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell	7.89e-19	70
myeloid cell	4.30e-18	112
common myeloid progenitor	4.30e-18	112
lymphocyte	2.91e-14	53
common lymphoid progenitor	2.91e-14	53
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell	3.89e-14	52
lymphocyte of B lineage	1.27e-10	24
pro-B cell	1.27e-10	24
B cell	1.31e-07	14

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
hematopoietic system	9.57e-26	102
blood island	9.57e-26	102
hemolymphoid system	9.34e-25	112
bone marrow	5.73e-18	80
bone element	1.19e-13	86
immune system	1.28e-11	115
skeletal element	2.68e-10	101
skeletal system	2.68e-10	101
lateral plate mesoderm	4.10e-09	216
adult organism	4.42e-07	115

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
CTCF#10664	4	5.36025637307503	0.00121114538164362	0.00817229697076356
E2F1#1869	4	4.90738921487932	0.00172402235736179	0.0106491111296728
EBF1#1879	4	8.906466846569	0.0001588790747201	0.00199557085805082
ELF1#1997	4	4.25809795880754	0.00304152556578124	0.0160869993195901
MYC#4609	4	5.2222818716094	0.00134430939527274	0.00887585844815333
NFKB1#4790	4	5.48806342419384	0.00110219956630198	0.00767826977754884
NFYB#4801	4	16.7597932535365	1.26678572070404e-05	0.00031122520321009
REST#5978	4	9.65002871612802	0.000115282561421917	0.00156995637401794
RFX5#5993	4	12.0479108271951	4.74457429336527e-05	0.00082641526788655
SMARCB1#6598	4	18.2527157811574	9.00423392720929e-06	0.000241435991559387
SP1#6667	4	5.6983813781409	0.000948260606533398	0.00684040540722072
TAF1#6872	4	3.34304628574529	0.00800566489870165	0.0322123453673718
TCF7L2#6934	4	10.7701765631373	7.42969445082454e-05	0.00115434373512297
YY1#7528	4	4.91117074985386	0.0017187183805544	0.0106833251366933
ZEB1#6935	4	16.8884320175439	1.22862303393937e-05	0.000304138803132482
ZNF263#10127	3	6.16638122775801	0.00653981434797598	0.0279727923450163

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.