Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2578

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:20, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2578_Eosinophils_CD14_CD19_Neutrophils_CD4_Whole_CD14CD16



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:2487990..2488033,+p1@TNFRSF14
Hg19::chr2:231191875..231191918,+p1@SP140L
Hg19::chr2:231280908..231280945,+p1@SP100
Hg19::chr7:144533074..144533153,-p1@TPK1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0009229thiamin diphosphate biosynthetic process0.0052451874720812
GO:0006772thiamin metabolic process0.0052451874720812
GO:0042724thiamin and derivative biosynthetic process0.0052451874720812
GO:0042357thiamin diphosphate metabolic process0.0052451874720812
GO:0004788thiamin diphosphokinase activity0.0052451874720812
GO:0042723thiamin and derivative metabolic process0.00728455370169519
GO:0005031tumor necrosis factor receptor activity0.00971130870574048
GO:0043120tumor necrosis factor binding0.00971130870574048
GO:0005035death receptor activity0.00971130870574048
GO:0016778diphosphotransferase activity0.0122348080968153
GO:0016605PML body0.0127107404706818
GO:0006767water-soluble vitamin metabolic process0.0465402161415903



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte1.04e-54140
hematopoietic stem cell7.31e-46172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell7.31e-46172
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.03e-45124
nongranular leukocyte2.01e-45119
hematopoietic cell1.04e-44182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.02e-42165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.02e-42165
myeloid leukocyte1.86e-2876
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.09e-2471
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.68e-2470
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.01e-2265
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.36e-2242
monopoietic cell2.38e-2263
monocyte2.38e-2263
monoblast2.38e-2263
promonocyte2.38e-2263
myeloid cell1.81e-21112
common myeloid progenitor1.81e-21112
lymphocyte2.16e-2053
common lymphoid progenitor2.16e-2053
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.32e-2052
mesenchymal cell4.30e-20358
connective tissue cell9.65e-20365
classical monocyte3.33e-1945
multi fate stem cell1.42e-13430
motile cell1.22e-12390
somatic stem cell5.32e-12436
stem cell4.92e-11444
T cell9.60e-1125
pro-T cell9.60e-1125
mature alpha-beta T cell2.09e-1018
alpha-beta T cell2.09e-1018
immature T cell2.09e-1018
mature T cell2.09e-1018
immature alpha-beta T cell2.09e-1018
lymphocyte of B lineage2.38e-0924
pro-B cell2.38e-0924
B cell2.28e-0814
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell4.34e-0711
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system1.14e-33112
hematopoietic system3.68e-32102
blood island3.68e-32102
bone marrow4.85e-2380
immune system1.81e-20115
bone element2.29e-1986
connective tissue3.78e-19375
skeletal element3.56e-16101
skeletal system3.56e-16101
lateral plate mesoderm2.37e-13216
musculoskeletal system9.05e-08167
blood1.77e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid1.77e-0715
organism substance1.77e-0715


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BATF#10538212.17890089615180.009566758805047810.0360207196928541
FOS#235336.74846648167080.005032452776317940.0234698729796315
GABPB1#255335.300762877136630.01012678824234270.0378631596048413
IRF1#365947.63716375356390.0002938853996185490.00307731073298192
IRF4#3662210.95725634337210.01174530180688030.0428470283771272
NR2C2#7182216.30730545262040.005411825344648220.0245581415237765
PAX5#507935.002174148383370.01196533174786410.0435007930662852
POLR3A#11128184.78302752293580.01174284177711620.0428635066531607
PRDM1#639265.91547788873040.0003415175120768950.00346760134588751
REST#597837.237521537096020.004104697304192610.0195829556325692
SPI1#668836.153242631392040.006580387113059030.0281014495297993
SRF#6722310.34788369662590.001439893778401260.00923943636780839
STAT1#6772210.35329374859960.01310777476171260.0464937810195117
STAT2#6773232.63188559322030.001379588775125520.00898384287849694
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.0322483756838625
ZBTB7A#5134135.513931980906920.009038352821081090.034247234708881



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.