Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1468

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:01, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1468_immature_CD14_Basophils_Monocytederived_migratory_Peripheral_Macrophage



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:192520178..192520200,-p@chr1:192520178..192520200
-
Hg19::chr2:235314156..235314171,-p@chr2:235314156..235314171
-
Hg19::chr2:61110347..61110358,+p@chr2:61110347..61110358
+
Hg19::chr2:8379719..8379724,-p@chr2:8379719..8379724
-
Hg19::chr7:151534954..151535001,+p@chr7:151534954..151535001
+
Hg19::chrX:13023985..13024011,+p@chrX:13023985..13024011
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte4.49e-52140
hematopoietic stem cell8.54e-47172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell8.54e-47172
hematopoietic cell5.04e-45182
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.63e-4471
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell8.87e-44124
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.27e-4365
myeloid leukocyte2.97e-4376
nongranular leukocyte7.60e-43119
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.20e-4270
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.18e-42165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.18e-42165
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.15e-4142
monopoietic cell3.78e-4163
monocyte3.78e-4163
monoblast3.78e-4163
promonocyte3.78e-4163
myeloid cell2.74e-38112
common myeloid progenitor2.74e-38112
classical monocyte1.33e-3745
mesenchymal cell9.42e-17358
connective tissue cell1.20e-15365
motile cell3.65e-14390
intermediate monocyte8.73e-109
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte8.73e-109
multi fate stem cell2.36e-09430
stem cell3.57e-09444
dendritic cell4.48e-0910
somatic stem cell9.91e-09436
conventional dendritic cell1.36e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow1.28e-4280
hematopoietic system1.84e-41102
blood island1.84e-41102
bone element8.51e-3886
hemolymphoid system1.74e-37112
immune system4.03e-30115
skeletal element2.76e-29101
skeletal system2.76e-29101
connective tissue3.68e-14375
musculoskeletal system2.74e-11167
lateral plate mesoderm1.58e-09216


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
NFKB1#479043.658708949462560.01207927289015230.0438372083318721



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.