Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1512

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:23, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1512_Smooth_hepatic_mesenchymal_Mallassezderived_Small_Gingival_Ewing



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:145788942..145788958,-p7@PLOD2
Hg19::chr3:145789101..145789120,-p5@PLOD2
Hg19::chr3:145824416..145824437,-p@chr3:145824416..145824437
-
Hg19::chr3:145838965..145839010,+p@chr3:145838965..145839010
+
Hg19::chr3:145878962..145878979,-p1@PLOD2
Hg19::chr3:145879113..145879126,-p2@PLOD2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
unilaminar epithelium6.83e-19148
vasculature2.73e-1878
vascular system2.73e-1878
artery1.91e-1742
arterial blood vessel1.91e-1742
arterial system1.91e-1742
epithelial tube open at both ends9.40e-1759
blood vessel9.40e-1759
blood vasculature9.40e-1759
vascular cord9.40e-1759
vessel1.26e-1668
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm3.37e-1683
epithelial tube1.40e-15117
trunk mesenchyme2.56e-15122
systemic artery9.44e-1533
systemic arterial system9.44e-1533
multilaminar epithelium1.45e-1483
mesenchyme3.09e-14160
entire embryonic mesenchyme3.09e-14160
skeletal muscle tissue5.62e-1462
striated muscle tissue5.62e-1462
myotome5.62e-1462
muscle tissue7.76e-1464
musculature7.76e-1464
musculature of body7.76e-1464
somite7.84e-1471
presomitic mesoderm7.84e-1471
presumptive segmental plate7.84e-1471
dermomyotome7.84e-1471
trunk paraxial mesoderm7.84e-1471
dense mesenchyme tissue1.05e-1373
paraxial mesoderm2.08e-1372
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.08e-1372
cardiovascular system5.49e-13109
circulatory system8.85e-13112
epithelial vesicle1.90e-1278
trunk2.19e-11199
organism subdivision6.32e-11264
multi-tissue structure1.78e-09342
anatomical cluster2.65e-09373
multi-cellular organism3.29e-09656
epithelium4.50e-09306
cell layer4.66e-09309
aorta1.04e-0821
aortic system1.04e-0821
anatomical conduit4.27e-07240
smooth muscle tissue6.58e-0715
anatomical system8.53e-07624
blood vessel smooth muscle9.70e-0710
arterial system smooth muscle9.70e-0710
artery smooth muscle tissue9.70e-0710
aorta smooth muscle tissue9.70e-0710
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer4.89e-0814


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.