Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3946

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:32, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3946_adult_splenic_xeroderma_CD4_b_B_lymphangiectasia



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:226998778..226998788,+p@chr1:226998778..226998788
+
Hg19::chr2:105990435..105990459,-p@chr2:105990435..105990459
-
Hg19::chr7:98528769..98528784,+p@chr7:98528769..98528784
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.80e-2252
lymphocyte1.43e-2153
common lymphoid progenitor1.43e-2153
nucleate cell1.14e-2055
lymphocyte of B lineage1.45e-1424
pro-B cell1.45e-1424
nongranular leukocyte1.92e-09115
naive T cell9.82e-093
T cell7.89e-0825
pro-T cell7.89e-0825
mature alpha-beta T cell8.75e-0818
alpha-beta T cell8.75e-0818
immature T cell8.75e-0818
mature T cell8.75e-0818
immature alpha-beta T cell8.75e-0818
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.04e-07120
leukocyte1.69e-07136
CD4-positive, alpha-beta thymocyte4.57e-071
naive thymus-derived CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell4.57e-071
mature CD4 single-positive thymocyte4.57e-071
resting double-positive thymocyte4.57e-071
double-positive blast4.57e-071
CD69-positive double-positive thymocyte4.57e-071
CD69-positive, CD4-positive single-positive thymocyte4.57e-071
CD4-positive, CD8-intermediate double-positive thymocyte4.57e-071
CD24-positive, CD4 single-positive thymocyte4.57e-071
antibody secreting cell4.85e-071
plasma cell4.85e-071
plasmablast4.85e-071
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemopoietic organ3.17e-137
immune organ3.17e-137
thymus5.00e-134
hemolymphoid system gland5.00e-134
thymic region5.00e-134
pharyngeal gland5.00e-134
thymus primordium5.00e-134
chordate pharynx4.95e-0910
pharyngeal region of foregut4.95e-0910
pharyngeal epithelium7.45e-096
pharynx3.20e-0811
tonsil7.73e-071
mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue7.73e-071
lymphoid tissue7.73e-071
tonsillar ring7.73e-071
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
genetic disease1.65e-071
monogenic disease1.65e-071
xeroderma pigmentosum1.65e-071


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.