Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4411

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:56, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4411_pancreatic_salivary_CD14_parotid_submaxillary_choriocarcinoma_seminal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:40631779..40631790,-p9@RBM47
Hg19::chr4:40631838..40631856,-p3@RBM47
Hg19::chr4:40631859..40631889,-p2@RBM47


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system5.84e-2498
blood island5.84e-2498
bone marrow1.12e-2276
bone element9.40e-2282
hemolymphoid system7.13e-20108
skeletal element6.60e-1990
immune system6.51e-1893
organ2.39e-16503
skeletal system1.56e-14100
embryo1.82e-09592
multi-cellular organism3.31e-09656
developing anatomical structure4.75e-09581
anatomical system1.38e-08624
anatomical group2.21e-08625
endoderm-derived structure5.04e-08160
endoderm5.04e-08160
presumptive endoderm5.04e-08160
immaterial anatomical entity7.99e-08117
digestive system1.59e-07145
digestive tract1.59e-07145
primitive gut1.59e-07145
anatomical space1.82e-0795
subdivision of digestive tract2.01e-07118
embryonic structure3.69e-07564
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma9.73e-08106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0280693452767203
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326904978979814
GATA3#2625327.2365163572064.94721007899563e-050.000853314076697315
GTF2F1#2962312.73966087675770.0004835525047438590.0043528477885661
NR3C1#2908314.9730233311730.0002978331194675480.00309752969170198
NRF1#4899312.21027944771090.0005492172401020010.00472718801211578
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0173453812504457
STAT1#6772320.70658749719920.0001125992441046670.00155203279068857
STAT3#6774310.51946499715420.0008589184530415310.00644707376147797
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00617903815578119
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0190927851545556
USF2#7392312.99219738506960.0004558979393427810.00422555243938771



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.