Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2974

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:50, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2974_Mesenchymal_tenocyte_CD14_Cardiac_Synoviocyte_mesodermal_Hepatic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:105212059..105212110,-p2@CALHM2
Hg19::chr10:105212113..105212139,-p1@CALHM2
Hg19::chr10:105212141..105212183,-p3@CALHM2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast2.98e-1576
multi fate stem cell2.90e-09427
somatic stem cell1.99e-08433
connective tissue cell1.17e-07361
mesenchymal cell3.46e-07354
skin fibroblast3.50e-0723
stem cell5.38e-07441
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
mesoderm1.13e-18315
mesoderm-derived structure1.13e-18315
presumptive mesoderm1.13e-18315
lateral plate mesoderm2.17e-16203
musculoskeletal system3.07e-10167
hemolymphoid system4.07e-08108
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm6.22e-0883
circulatory system6.60e-08112
cardiovascular system7.41e-08109
connective tissue1.13e-07371
hematopoietic system1.87e-0798
blood island1.87e-0798


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0278091774535428
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0323304861949486
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0293018662486311
NRF1#4899312.21027944771090.0005492172401020010.00469161617364738
SPI1#668838.204323508522730.001810593189410520.0108769940816132
TCF12#6938310.63446490218640.0008313523990202070.00627443367547849



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.