Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1979

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:54, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1979_Fibroblast_salivary_CD14_immature_amniotic_Melanocyte_Smooth



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:74405501..74405515,+p4@CD109
Hg19::chr6:74405772..74405779,+p7@CD109
Hg19::chr6:74405789..74405800,+p6@CD109
Hg19::chr6:74405804..74405817,+p3@CD109
Hg19::chr6:74405870..74405932,+p1@CD109


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast1.63e-1476
skin fibroblast3.69e-1223
somatic cell1.40e-11588
animal cell1.80e-09679
eukaryotic cell1.80e-09679
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
surface structure2.12e-1399
musculoskeletal system9.84e-13167
mesoderm5.59e-12315
mesoderm-derived structure5.59e-12315
presumptive mesoderm5.59e-12315
multi-cellular organism7.21e-11656
anatomical system3.24e-10624
skin of body4.55e-1041
anatomical group5.35e-10625
integument8.32e-1046
integumental system8.32e-1046
skeletal system1.44e-09100
skeletal element5.89e-0890
organ1.88e-07503
organ component layer1.90e-0766


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186954.907389214879320.0003512818099256460.00353478378907645
FOS#235358.99795530889441.69470025615156e-050.000389851982493861
FOSL1#8061431.77086377309841.96715033715934e-067.22896601205435e-05
FOSL2#2355413.54416048364945.7953819349229e-050.000965333164117086
FOXA1#3169511.08141974938555.98116883436141e-060.000179244560083751
FOXA2#3170419.70437100213221.31345078265786e-050.000320803288797953
JUN#3725410.01026335386910.0001908531347801070.00230646963009715
JUND#372756.994663941871035.97069468343598e-050.000985419377438954
NR3C1#2908514.9730233311731.32777388277837e-065.25668599482524e-05
STAT3#6774510.51946499715427.759040745861e-060.000220742701295826
TFAP2A#7020516.5186343730458.12390055913032e-073.54259728807938e-05
TFAP2C#7022510.80922860986026.77323239348459e-060.000197484538789262
YY1#752854.911170749853860.00034993140821360.00353208527519282



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.