Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1432

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1432_mesenchymal_Smooth_Lymphatic_Preadipocyte_Sebocyte_CD14_anaplastic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:38171624..38171635,+p2@CSF3
Hg19::chr17:38171681..38171699,+p1@CSF3
Hg19::chr17:38171895..38171901,+p4@CSF3
Hg19::chr17:38172763..38172779,+p@chr17:38172763..38172779
+
Hg19::chr17:38172802..38172815,+p@chr17:38172802..38172815
+
Hg19::chr17:38173175..38173226,+p@chr17:38173175..38173226
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
systemic artery1.20e-1633
systemic arterial system1.20e-1633
blood vessel smooth muscle7.90e-1410
arterial system smooth muscle7.90e-1410
artery smooth muscle tissue7.90e-1410
aorta smooth muscle tissue7.90e-1410
multilaminar epithelium2.02e-1383
artery5.34e-1342
arterial blood vessel5.34e-1342
arterial system5.34e-1342
somite1.99e-1271
presomitic mesoderm1.99e-1271
presumptive segmental plate1.99e-1271
dermomyotome1.99e-1271
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.99e-1271
paraxial mesoderm3.89e-1272
presumptive paraxial mesoderm3.89e-1272
smooth muscle tissue5.09e-1215
dense mesenchyme tissue7.43e-1273
skeletal muscle tissue7.79e-1262
striated muscle tissue7.79e-1262
myotome7.79e-1262
vessel2.62e-1168
muscle tissue3.14e-1164
musculature3.14e-1164
musculature of body3.14e-1164
epithelial vesicle1.45e-1078
epithelial tube open at both ends2.09e-0959
blood vessel2.09e-0959
blood vasculature2.09e-0959
vascular cord2.09e-0959
vasculature6.89e-0978
vascular system6.89e-0978
right ovary9.30e-095
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.97e-0883
aorta8.39e-0821
aortic system8.39e-0821
female gonad1.05e-0713
cardiovascular system9.49e-07109
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer9.06e-0914


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.515118
MA0004.10.558729
MA0006.10.391183
MA0007.11.33289
MA0009.11.03681
MA0014.10.0254709
MA0017.10.432438
MA0019.10.7124
MA0024.10.929647
MA0025.11.17262
MA0027.12.65688
MA0028.10.408079
MA0029.10.949428
MA0030.10.937696
MA0031.10.871496
MA0038.10.665566
MA0040.10.955415
MA0041.10.578072
MA0042.10.544748
MA0043.11.03713
MA0046.11.02569
MA0048.11.45353
MA0050.10.545671
MA0051.10.661179
MA0052.10.959373
MA0055.12.86804
MA0056.10
MA0057.11.41984
MA0058.10.458909
MA0059.10.457555
MA0060.10.267412
MA0061.11.93637
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.66601
MA0067.11.35893
MA0068.10.199491
MA0069.11.02175
MA0070.11.01032
MA0071.10.625297
MA0072.11.00572
MA0073.10.120085
MA0074.10.660398
MA0076.10.475586
MA0077.10.997832
MA0078.10.763954
MA0081.11.15882
MA0083.11.04447
MA0084.11.5477
MA0087.11.00322
MA0088.11.09824
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.490736
MA0091.10.561458
MA0092.10.522012
MA0093.10.394379
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.679972
MA0101.10.397846
MA0103.10.381434
MA0105.14.14294
MA0106.10.70837
MA0107.10.857383
MA0108.23.33678
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.504913
MA0113.11.72264
MA0114.10.314898
MA0115.11.28169
MA0116.10.865577
MA0117.11.07516
MA0119.10.440684
MA0122.11.10154
MA0124.11.23968
MA0125.11.15445
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.782708
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.06778
MA0136.10.672893
MA0139.10.226048
MA0140.10.622527
MA0141.10.455728
MA0142.10.838805
MA0143.11.72302
MA0144.10.811435
MA0145.12.32339
MA0146.11.8938
MA0147.10.327615
MA0148.10.584698
MA0149.10.612449
MA0062.20.23336
MA0035.20.621793
MA0039.20.569061
MA0138.20.765223
MA0002.20.255126
MA0137.21.06611
MA0104.20.26661
MA0047.20.695777
MA0112.20.680553
MA0065.20.354331
MA0150.10.484557
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.629368
MA0153.11.13732
MA0154.10.819655
MA0155.10.65596
MA0156.10.417278
MA0157.10.810597
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.875329
MA0160.10.600559
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0383129
MA0163.11.60684
MA0164.10.738243
MA0080.20.394469
MA0018.20.709805
MA0099.20.629739
MA0079.20.0607789
MA0102.21.58513
MA0258.10.788656
MA0259.10.336472
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
POLR2A#543062.147453176558070.01019570676818780.0380255479471045
STAT3#677435.259732498577120.01377662058078550.0484727445620948
TCF7L2#693435.385088281568670.01290488779931040.0464093377250155



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.