Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2073

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:01, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2073_Macrophage_Dendritic_CD14_Monocytederived_acute_placenta_mesenchymal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:80737702..80737731,-p@chr10:80737702..80737731
-
Hg19::chr10:89520122..89520126,+p@chr10:89520122..89520126
+
Hg19::chr11:60050026..60050037,+p5@MS4A4A
Hg19::chr8:132864897..132864901,-p@chr8:132864897..132864901
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
monopoietic cell6.28e-8559
monocyte6.28e-8559
monoblast6.28e-8559
promonocyte6.28e-8559
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor8.60e-8261
defensive cell5.38e-8048
phagocyte5.38e-8048
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell9.01e-7566
myeloid leukocyte2.83e-7472
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.72e-7367
classical monocyte4.76e-6442
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.76e-6442
myeloid cell1.38e-45108
common myeloid progenitor1.38e-45108
stuff accumulating cell8.04e-4487
nongranular leukocyte5.81e-42115
leukocyte3.71e-37136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.67e-36120
hematopoietic stem cell1.03e-27168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.03e-27168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.28e-26161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.28e-26161
hematopoietic cell1.13e-25177
macrophage9.50e-186
connective tissue cell2.00e-09361
mesenchymal cell3.03e-09354
adult endothelial progenitor cell9.27e-093
multi fate stem cell1.34e-07427
motile cell2.22e-07386
somatic stem cell2.56e-07433
stem cell5.89e-07441
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow1.56e-6676
bone element7.97e-6182
immune system3.23e-5793
skeletal element5.96e-5790
hematopoietic system3.58e-5698
blood island3.58e-5698
hemolymphoid system4.19e-52108
skeletal system4.55e-50100
musculoskeletal system2.59e-29167
lateral plate mesoderm2.96e-24203
mesoderm1.85e-17315
mesoderm-derived structure1.85e-17315
presumptive mesoderm1.85e-17315
connective tissue1.82e-09371
organ3.32e-07503


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.