Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2549

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:35, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:22534773..22534793,+p@chr10:22534773..22534793
+
Mm9::chr10:22539932..22539956,-p1@Tcf21
Mm9::chr10:22540074..22540085,+p@chr10:22540074..22540085
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical space5.89e-1357
reproductive structure1.12e-1026
reproductive system1.12e-1026
reproductive organ6.37e-1024
gonad1.07e-0918
gonad primordium1.07e-0918
subdivision of trunk1.58e-0966
lung2.42e-0914
respiratory tube2.42e-0914
respiration organ2.42e-0914
pair of lungs2.42e-0914
lung primordium2.42e-0914
lung bud2.42e-0914
external genitalia4.92e-0917
indifferent external genitalia4.92e-0917
indifferent gonad4.92e-0917
trunk region element4.94e-0979
compound organ6.97e-0943
trunk8.20e-0990
immaterial anatomical entity9.75e-0979
kidney1.99e-0814
kidney mesenchyme1.99e-0814
upper urinary tract1.99e-0814
kidney rudiment1.99e-0814
kidney field1.99e-0814
body cavity precursor2.00e-0838
renal system2.66e-0819
male organism2.94e-0816
male reproductive system2.94e-0816
urinary system structure3.55e-0818
male reproductive organ3.74e-0815
body cavity4.41e-0837
body cavity or lining4.41e-0837
anatomical cavity6.13e-0839
testis8.25e-0814
primary circulatory organ1.29e-0718
heart1.29e-0718
primitive heart tube1.29e-0718
primary heart field1.29e-0718
anterior lateral plate mesoderm1.29e-0718
heart tube1.29e-0718
heart primordium1.29e-0718
cardiac mesoderm1.29e-0718
cardiogenic plate1.29e-0718
heart rudiment1.29e-0718
epithelial bud1.46e-0717


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}