Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2990

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:15, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr15:6547859..6547870,+p@chr15:6547859..6547870
+
Mm9::chr15:6549721..6549724,+p@chr15:6549721..6549724
+
Mm9::chr2:165898047..165898048,+p@chr2:165898047..165898048
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemopoietic organ8.90e-1629
immune organ8.90e-1629
gland of gut5.14e-1424
thymus2.95e-1323
neck2.95e-1323
respiratory system epithelium2.95e-1323
hemolymphoid system gland2.95e-1323
pharyngeal epithelium2.95e-1323
thymic region2.95e-1323
pharyngeal gland2.95e-1323
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm2.95e-1323
thymus primordium2.95e-1323
early pharyngeal endoderm2.95e-1323
hemolymphoid system3.76e-1348
immune system3.76e-1348
hematopoietic system7.74e-1345
blood island7.74e-1345
pharynx2.03e-1224
upper respiratory tract2.03e-1224
chordate pharynx2.03e-1224
pharyngeal arch system2.03e-1224
pharyngeal region of foregut2.03e-1224
segment of respiratory tract1.03e-1127
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure1.30e-1135
respiratory system1.56e-0942
foregut3.60e-0980
respiratory tract6.24e-0941
lateral plate mesoderm6.40e-0887
organ segment1.65e-0735
craniocervical region4.32e-0736


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}