Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4410: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0.154789347353621

Latest revision as of 12:45, 17 September 2013


Full id: C4410_small_Mesothelial_signet_kidney_colon_mesothelioma_bile



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:40517945..40517950,-p34@RBM47
Hg19::chr4:40517959..40517973,-p10@RBM47
Hg19::chr4:40517984..40518008,-p7@RBM47


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell1.87e-13253
mesothelial cell3.36e-1319
kidney tubule cell1.68e-0910
nephron tubule epithelial cell1.68e-0910
kidney cell3.08e-0917
kidney epithelial cell3.08e-0917
epithelial cell of nephron4.26e-0715
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
abdomen element3.85e-1454
abdominal segment element3.85e-1454
trunk region element4.42e-13101
abdominal segment of trunk1.15e-1260
abdomen1.15e-1260
gastrointestinal system3.57e-1225
subdivision of digestive tract3.39e-10118
intestine3.64e-1017
subdivision of trunk9.05e-10112
nephron tubule epithelium1.68e-0910
sac3.23e-0926
digestive system3.25e-09145
digestive tract3.25e-09145
primitive gut3.25e-09145
immaterial anatomical entity4.27e-09117
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction1.08e-0825
anatomical boundary1.08e-0825
hepatobiliary system1.08e-0825
foregut-midgut junction1.08e-0825
septum transversum1.08e-0825
kidney1.51e-0826
kidney mesenchyme1.51e-0826
upper urinary tract1.51e-0826
kidney rudiment1.51e-0826
kidney field1.51e-0826
epithelial sac2.22e-0825
digestive tract diverticulum2.99e-0823
excretory tube4.97e-0816
kidney epithelium4.97e-0816
endoderm-derived structure1.43e-07160
endoderm1.43e-07160
presumptive endoderm1.43e-07160
hepatic diverticulum2.03e-0722
liver primordium2.03e-0722
cortex2.33e-0715
nephron epithelium4.26e-0715
renal tubule4.26e-0715
nephron tubule4.26e-0715
nephron4.26e-0715
uriniferous tubule4.26e-0715
nephrogenic mesenchyme4.26e-0715
foregut4.72e-0787
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cancer4.10e-18235
carcinoma1.06e-17106
disease of cellular proliferation3.19e-17239
cell type cancer4.94e-14143
adenocarcinoma7.54e-1025
organ system cancer1.02e-08137


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.401049
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.13.14798
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.11.58389
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.557638
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.11.15625
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.11.84332
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.12.91768
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.11.70054
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.846801
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.11.35563
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.12.07172
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.752137
MA0146.10.348055
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.12.04956
MA0062.21.141
MA0035.22.07011
MA0039.21.62945
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.731309
MA0065.20.760954
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.711948
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.149099
MA0163.10.122425
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.311277
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.019074602870795
CEBPB#105137.971147625824820.001974187055288560.0115592376446309
CHD2#1106310.34402283411690.0009033701102746880.006622241240049
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0321886597008489
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0464197978623296
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.0128541213858415
JUN#3725312.51282919233630.0005103313992726250.00445676904495641
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0157328611269437
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0330651897552081
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140690211356079



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.