Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2252

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:10, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr19:22808028..22808033,+p@chr19:22808028..22808033
+
Mm9::chr19:22874985..22874987,+p@chr19:22874985..22874987
+
Mm9::chr19:22887817..22887818,+p@chr19:22887817..22887818
+
Mm9::chr19:22891234..22891238,+p@chr19:22891234..22891238
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
ecto-epithelium2.08e-1573
neurectoderm5.58e-1464
neural plate5.58e-1464
presumptive neural plate5.58e-1464
ectoderm-derived structure1.61e-1395
ectoderm1.61e-1395
presumptive ectoderm1.61e-1395
ectodermal placode8.74e-1213
sense organ2.24e-1112
sensory system2.24e-1112
entire sense organ system2.24e-1112
eye9.82e-119
camera-type eye9.82e-119
simple eye9.82e-119
immature eye9.82e-119
ocular region9.82e-119
visual system9.82e-119
face9.82e-119
optic cup9.82e-119
optic vesicle9.82e-119
eye primordium9.82e-119
pre-chordal neural plate1.12e-1049
head3.56e-1013
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.08e-1092
subdivision of head3.42e-0811
central nervous system8.40e-0873
nervous system8.90e-0875
regional part of nervous system3.52e-0754
neural tube4.63e-0752
neural rod4.63e-0752
future spinal cord4.63e-0752
neural keel4.63e-0752
brain7.63e-0747
future brain7.63e-0747


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}