Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1895

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:10, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1895_CD4_CD14_spinal_Mast_Monocytederived_Fibroblast_thalamus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:225754019..225754024,-p@chr2:225754019..225754024
-
Hg19::chr2:225783727..225783744,-p@chr2:225783727..225783744
-
Hg19::chr2:225783980..225783992,-p@chr2:225783980..225783992
-
Hg19::chr2:225784564..225784582,-p@chr2:225784564..225784582
-
Hg19::chr2:225784594..225784609,-p@chr2:225784594..225784609
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
nongranular leukocyte4.07e-31115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.64e-30120
leukocyte1.79e-28136
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.72e-27161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.72e-27161
hematopoietic stem cell6.72e-27168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell6.72e-27168
hematopoietic cell1.81e-25177
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.31e-2067
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.82e-1966
defensive cell1.54e-1848
phagocyte1.54e-1848
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.15e-1861
monopoietic cell2.23e-1859
monocyte2.23e-1859
monoblast2.23e-1859
promonocyte2.23e-1859
classical monocyte5.37e-1742
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte5.37e-1742
myeloid leukocyte3.09e-1672
myeloid cell2.35e-15108
common myeloid progenitor2.35e-15108
mesenchymal cell3.07e-13354
connective tissue cell4.04e-12361
lymphocyte1.15e-1153
common lymphoid progenitor1.15e-1153
motile cell4.63e-11386
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.67e-1152
nucleate cell9.18e-1155
T cell2.18e-0825
pro-T cell2.18e-0825
mature alpha-beta T cell7.84e-0818
alpha-beta T cell7.84e-0818
immature T cell7.84e-0818
mature T cell7.84e-0818
immature alpha-beta T cell7.84e-0818
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system2.49e-2098
blood island2.49e-2098
bone marrow6.72e-1876
immune system1.13e-1793
hemolymphoid system1.32e-17108
bone element4.06e-1782
skeletal element8.57e-1490
skeletal system1.18e-13100
connective tissue1.89e-11371
neural tube1.22e-1056
neural rod1.22e-1056
future spinal cord1.22e-1056
neural keel1.22e-1056
regional part of nervous system4.40e-0953
regional part of brain4.40e-0953
brain grey matter1.66e-0834
gray matter1.66e-0834
telencephalon4.00e-0834
regional part of forebrain8.55e-0841
forebrain8.55e-0841
anterior neural tube8.55e-0841
future forebrain8.55e-0841
regional part of telencephalon1.88e-0732
neural nucleus3.39e-079
nucleus of brain3.39e-079
cerebral hemisphere4.98e-0732


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.