Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2610

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:36, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2610_smallcell_Neutrophils_Eosinophils_Whole_CD19_CD14_placenta



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr20:2310953..2310974,+p@chr20:2310953..2310974
+
Hg19::chr6:41159227..41159256,-p1@AJ420509
Hg19::chr6:41168804..41168831,-p3@TREML2
Hg19::chr6:41168834..41168853,-p2@TREML2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell7.29e-58168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell7.29e-58168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.71e-55161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.71e-55161
hematopoietic cell2.37e-53177
leukocyte2.45e-52136
nongranular leukocyte2.98e-51115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell4.41e-45120
classical monocyte7.68e-3642
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte7.68e-3642
myeloid cell1.23e-35108
common myeloid progenitor1.23e-35108
myeloid leukocyte2.80e-3472
monopoietic cell9.92e-3159
monocyte9.92e-3159
monoblast9.92e-3159
promonocyte9.92e-3159
defensive cell9.48e-3048
phagocyte9.48e-3048
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.86e-2961
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.62e-2966
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.01e-2567
lymphocyte of B lineage1.81e-1924
pro-B cell1.81e-1924
nucleate cell7.77e-1955
lymphocyte4.10e-1753
common lymphoid progenitor4.10e-1753
B cell2.54e-1614
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.61e-1652
mesenchymal cell2.44e-12354
connective tissue cell1.32e-11361
stuff accumulating cell3.28e-1187
motile cell4.31e-09386
granulocyte6.23e-098
intermediate monocyte4.51e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte4.51e-079
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system6.64e-3598
blood island6.64e-3598
hemolymphoid system1.15e-32108
immune system2.94e-2293
bone marrow4.99e-2276
bone element1.98e-1982
skeletal element1.56e-1690
skeletal system1.31e-13100
blood3.85e-1315
haemolymphatic fluid3.85e-1315
organism substance3.85e-1315
connective tissue4.81e-11371
lateral plate mesoderm1.45e-09203
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
leukemia5.74e-0939
hematologic cancer9.97e-0951
immune system cancer9.97e-0951


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.