Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1103

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:24, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr12:74685803..74685810,+p4@Prkch
Mm9::chr12:74737680..74737682,+p@chr12:74737680..74737682
+
Mm9::chr12:74814898..74814903,+p@chr12:74814898..74814903
+
Mm9::chr12:74826649..74826653,+p@chr12:74826649..74826653
+
Mm9::chr12:74832768..74832772,+p@chr12:74832768..74832772
+
Mm9::chr12:74842928..74842966,+p@chr12:74842928..74842966
+
Mm9::chr12:74866678..74866679,+p@chr12:74866678..74866679
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
respiratory system8.57e-1442
respiratory tract1.94e-1341
foregut6.87e-1280
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure1.41e-1135
hemopoietic organ1.22e-0929
immune organ1.22e-0929
pharynx1.76e-0924
upper respiratory tract1.76e-0924
chordate pharynx1.76e-0924
pharyngeal arch system1.76e-0924
pharyngeal region of foregut1.76e-0924
organism subdivision2.25e-09150
gland of gut2.62e-0924
segment of respiratory tract2.64e-0927
thymus5.61e-0923
neck5.61e-0923
respiratory system epithelium5.61e-0923
hemolymphoid system gland5.61e-0923
pharyngeal epithelium5.61e-0923
thymic region5.61e-0923
pharyngeal gland5.61e-0923
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm5.61e-0923
thymus primordium5.61e-0923
early pharyngeal endoderm5.61e-0923
primordium3.48e-08134
craniocervical region8.03e-0836
lateral plate mesoderm2.04e-0787
anterior region of body2.61e-0743


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}