Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3091

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:47, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3091_granulocyte_Neutrophils_optic_skeletal_Eosinophils_immature_CD4



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:11863500..11863576,+p1@USP47
Hg19::chr1:179923875..179923954,+p1@CEP350
Hg19::chr8:42752053..42752154,+p1@HOOK3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0031122cytoplasmic microtubule organization and biogenesis0.00304662663369834
GO:0051645Golgi localization0.00304662663369834
GO:0015630microtubule cytoskeleton0.0157887649980403
GO:0005801cis-Golgi network0.018273841294435
GO:0044430cytoskeletal part0.0296554642569538
GO:0051640organelle localization0.0334813341011192
GO:0008017microtubule binding0.0425925335828027
GO:0005856cytoskeleton0.043737425088151
GO:0015631tubulin binding0.0452728129930291
GO:0005819spindle0.0474197284120837



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte7.09e-36136
hematopoietic stem cell1.31e-33168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.31e-33168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell7.32e-31161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell7.32e-31161
hematopoietic cell8.78e-30177
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.17e-27120
nongranular leukocyte2.38e-25115
myeloid leukocyte8.33e-2472
myeloid cell3.71e-23108
common myeloid progenitor3.71e-23108
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.16e-2167
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.09e-2066
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor9.47e-1961
monopoietic cell1.42e-1759
monocyte1.42e-1759
monoblast1.42e-1759
promonocyte1.42e-1759
classical monocyte3.72e-1742
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte3.72e-1742
defensive cell6.58e-1648
phagocyte6.58e-1648
nucleate cell8.45e-0855
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.62e-0752
lymphocyte1.69e-0753
common lymphoid progenitor1.69e-0753
mature alpha-beta T cell4.07e-0718
alpha-beta T cell4.07e-0718
immature T cell4.07e-0718
mature T cell4.07e-0718
immature alpha-beta T cell4.07e-0718
dendritic cell4.69e-0710
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.51e-26114
hematopoietic system1.36e-2098
blood island1.36e-2098
hemolymphoid system1.77e-17108
bone marrow7.48e-1776
bone element1.19e-1682
immune system3.32e-1593
skeletal element5.12e-1390
neural tube1.15e-1256
neural rod1.15e-1256
future spinal cord1.15e-1256
neural keel1.15e-1256
skeletal system5.71e-12100
regional part of nervous system1.05e-1153
regional part of brain1.05e-1153
regional part of forebrain7.50e-1141
forebrain7.50e-1141
anterior neural tube7.50e-1141
future forebrain7.50e-1141
brain2.47e-1068
future brain2.47e-1068
central nervous system9.45e-1081
nervous system1.82e-0989
brain grey matter3.04e-0834
gray matter3.04e-0834
telencephalon7.92e-0834
regional part of telencephalon1.77e-0732
cerebral hemisphere3.71e-0732


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BRCA1#672213.45615376214920.007119807716084560.0296095885820155
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0323600852777799
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0460092826431389
GTF2B#2959221.29588662288280.002878180589911410.015573220527912
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0108300324334896
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0268607366797856
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0172290661632547
POU2F2#545239.106124057742520.001324165192682130.00879456207049469
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0275425094954074
XRCC4#751811432.767441860460.0006977913838891460.00561150645584034
ZBTB33#10009221.10981668665410.002928597060603240.0156282125804681



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.