Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1333

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:49, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1333_Eosinophils_CD14_Neutrophils_Whole_Basophils_Peripheral_CD14CD16



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:121289611..121289623,+p@chr11:121289611..121289623
+
Hg19::chr12:6442318..6442341,-p10@TNFRSF1A
Hg19::chr1:28269913..28269921,-p@chr1:28269913..28269921
-
Hg19::chr8:142129999..142130013,+p@chr8:142129999..142130013
+
Hg19::chr9:120487715..120487720,-p@chr9:120487715..120487720
-
Hg19::chrX:106943045..106943052,-p@chrX:106943045..106943052
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte1.20e-11742
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.20e-11742
defensive cell1.10e-10148
phagocyte1.10e-10148
myeloid leukocyte2.77e-9172
monopoietic cell2.45e-7959
monocyte2.45e-7959
monoblast2.45e-7959
promonocyte2.45e-7959
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.87e-7661
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell5.34e-7066
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell8.04e-6967
myeloid cell1.84e-57108
common myeloid progenitor1.84e-57108
stuff accumulating cell1.34e-5187
leukocyte4.44e-50136
nongranular leukocyte1.04e-42115
hematopoietic stem cell2.03e-38168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.03e-38168
hematopoietic cell6.81e-36177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell5.12e-35161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell5.12e-35161
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.73e-34120
intermediate monocyte4.19e-219
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte4.19e-219
granulocyte8.30e-218
blood cell7.79e-1511
mesenchymal cell2.81e-12354
connective tissue cell8.05e-12361
neutrophil1.01e-113
basophil1.66e-103
motile cell3.25e-10386
single nucleate cell3.89e-103
mononuclear cell3.89e-103
non-classical monocyte4.43e-103
CD14-low, CD16-positive monocyte4.43e-103
multi fate stem cell2.91e-08427
somatic stem cell5.39e-08433
stem cell1.19e-07441
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system5.70e-8198
blood island5.70e-8198
hemolymphoid system1.79e-72108
bone marrow1.33e-5976
bone element1.44e-5482
immune system1.47e-4993
skeletal element6.87e-4990
skeletal system4.67e-43100
lateral plate mesoderm2.87e-33203
blood3.20e-2615
haemolymphatic fluid3.20e-2615
organism substance3.20e-2615
musculoskeletal system6.23e-22167
mesoderm2.82e-18315
mesoderm-derived structure2.82e-18315
presumptive mesoderm2.82e-18315
connective tissue3.37e-11371


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
STAT3#677435.259732498577120.01377662058078550.0484678460161915



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.