Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3315

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:43, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr2:134611911..134611932,+p2@Plcb1
Mm9::chr2:134611934..134611954,+p3@Plcb1
Mm9::chr2:135138128..135138130,+p@chr2:135138128..135138130
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neuron9.59e-0733
neuronal stem cell9.59e-0733
neuroblast9.59e-0733
electrically signaling cell9.59e-0733

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
tube1.56e-11114
central nervous system2.91e-1173
nervous system1.42e-1075
anatomical conduit7.11e-10122
gray matter2.15e-0934
regional part of nervous system2.58e-0954
neural tube4.79e-0952
neural rod4.79e-0952
future spinal cord4.79e-0952
neural keel4.79e-0952
neurectoderm1.95e-0864
neural plate1.95e-0864
presumptive neural plate1.95e-0864
multi-cellular organism3.66e-08333
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.88e-0892
brain grey matter6.17e-0829
regional part of telencephalon6.17e-0829
telencephalon6.17e-0829
trunk region element7.48e-0879
ectoderm-derived structure8.60e-0895
ectoderm8.60e-0895
presumptive ectoderm8.60e-0895
occipital lobe9.27e-0810
visual cortex9.27e-0810
neocortex9.27e-0810
brain9.64e-0847
future brain9.64e-0847
regional part of brain3.12e-0746
cerebral cortex3.37e-0721
cerebral hemisphere3.37e-0721
pallium3.37e-0721
subdivision of trunk4.02e-0766
ecto-epithelium4.89e-0773


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}