Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2608

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:22, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2608_Melanocyte_heart_skeletal_melanoma_left_umbilical_carcinoid



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr20:20065997..20066011,+p7@C20orf26
Hg19::chr20:20066033..20066042,+p5@C20orf26
Hg19::chr20:20066066..20066103,+p2@C20orf26
Hg19::chr20:20069105..20069117,-p@chr20:20069105..20069117
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
melanocyte9.15e-1310
melanoblast9.15e-1310
pigment cell1.30e-0814
migratory neural crest cell1.09e-0741
light melanocyte1.40e-073
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism3.12e-32115
neural tube1.01e-1257
neural rod1.01e-1257
future spinal cord1.01e-1257
neural keel1.01e-1257
neurectoderm6.60e-1190
ectoderm1.76e-10173
presumptive ectoderm1.76e-10173
regional part of nervous system2.69e-1094
nervous system2.69e-1094
nucleus of brain1.87e-099
neural nucleus1.87e-099
neural plate5.12e-0986
presumptive neural plate5.12e-0986
ectoderm-derived structure5.77e-09169
regional part of brain1.08e-0859
central nervous system2.40e-0882
posterior neural tube2.53e-0815
chordal neural plate2.53e-0815
brainstem6.63e-088
brain2.67e-0769
future brain2.67e-0769
cardiac chamber2.83e-073
regional part of forebrain3.98e-0741
forebrain3.98e-0741
future forebrain3.98e-0741
basal ganglion6.29e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis6.29e-079
aggregate regional part of brain6.29e-079
collection of basal ganglia6.29e-079
cerebral subcortex6.29e-079
anterior neural tube7.06e-0742
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
neuroectodermal tumor1.78e-1010
neuroendocrine tumor1.94e-076


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.