Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1468

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:19, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1468_immature_CD14_Basophils_Monocytederived_migratory_Peripheral_Macrophage



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:192520178..192520200,-p@chr1:192520178..192520200
-
Hg19::chr2:235314156..235314171,-p@chr2:235314156..235314171
-
Hg19::chr2:61110347..61110358,+p@chr2:61110347..61110358
+
Hg19::chr2:8379719..8379724,-p@chr2:8379719..8379724
-
Hg19::chr7:151534954..151535001,+p@chr7:151534954..151535001
+
Hg19::chrX:13023985..13024011,+p@chrX:13023985..13024011
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte5.57e-9542
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte5.57e-9542
defensive cell6.63e-8248
phagocyte6.63e-8248
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.16e-7667
myeloid leukocyte5.19e-7472
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.28e-7361
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.24e-6966
leukocyte4.34e-69136
monopoietic cell2.37e-6759
monocyte2.37e-6759
monoblast2.37e-6759
promonocyte2.37e-6759
myeloid cell2.99e-62108
common myeloid progenitor2.99e-62108
hematopoietic stem cell7.16e-56168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell7.16e-56168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.62e-54120
hematopoietic cell2.06e-52177
nongranular leukocyte6.51e-52115
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell7.47e-52161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell7.47e-52161
stuff accumulating cell6.82e-4187
intermediate monocyte4.90e-239
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte4.90e-239
mesenchymal cell5.52e-21354
connective tissue cell2.50e-20361
motile cell5.06e-18386
Langerhans cell6.24e-175
multi fate stem cell3.36e-15427
stem cell3.56e-15441
somatic stem cell8.25e-15433
conventional dendritic cell7.19e-138
basophil1.14e-103
single nucleate cell1.18e-103
mononuclear cell1.18e-103
dendritic cell2.13e-1010
natural killer cell5.89e-103
pro-NK cell5.89e-103
CD1a-positive Langerhans cell2.04e-082
immature CD1a-positive Langerhans cell2.04e-082
somatic cell2.20e-07588
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow7.66e-7076
bone element5.23e-6482
hematopoietic system2.51e-6398
blood island2.51e-6398
immune system5.65e-5893
skeletal element2.00e-5790
hemolymphoid system1.82e-56108
skeletal system1.15e-50100
musculoskeletal system3.71e-26167
lateral plate mesoderm7.51e-25203
connective tissue1.95e-19371
mesoderm7.54e-13315
mesoderm-derived structure7.54e-13315
presumptive mesoderm7.54e-13315


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
NFKB1#479043.658708949462560.01207927289015230.0438372083318721



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.