Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4359

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:42, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4359_mesenchymal_Mesothelial_Endothelial_Cardiac_mesothelioma_myeloma_anaplastic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:110723252..110723291,-p2@CFI
Hg19::chr4:110723298..110723312,-p3@CFI
Hg19::chr4:110723340..110723356,-p5@CFI


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endothelial cell of vascular tree1.86e-0924
lining cell5.64e-0758
barrier cell5.64e-0758
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical cluster8.76e-19373
adult organism3.78e-16114
anatomical conduit5.00e-14240
cell layer2.79e-13309
epithelium7.44e-13306
tube8.09e-12192
anatomical system5.32e-11624
anatomical group7.57e-11625
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.59e-10132
neural plate1.88e-0982
presumptive neural plate1.88e-0982
multi-cellular organism2.41e-09656
multi-tissue structure1.01e-08342
epithelial tube1.53e-08117
neurectoderm1.60e-0886
primordium1.23e-07160
developing anatomical structure2.11e-07581
organ2.43e-07503
organ system subdivision2.53e-07223
pigment epithelium of eye2.59e-0711
embryonic structure3.60e-07564
central nervous system4.29e-0781
germ layer4.51e-07560
germ layer / neural crest4.51e-07560
embryonic tissue4.51e-07560
presumptive structure4.51e-07560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure4.51e-07560
epiblast (generic)4.51e-07560
embryo7.29e-07592
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer9.79e-0814


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0168009092639066
HNF4A#3172323.13229036295378.07584663437677e-050.00123218896515365
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0247428522842664
STAT3#6774310.51946499715420.0008589184530415310.0064447578358506
TCF7L2#6934310.77017656313730.0008003181298398380.00616086276718087
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0190891912185265



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.