Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2813

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:04, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr13:108948778..108948824,-p1@Ndufaf2
Mm9::chr4:12098906..12098917,-p4@Fam92a
Mm9::chr4:12098928..12098943,-p3@Fam92a


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.18e-1992
neurectoderm1.94e-1564
neural plate1.94e-1564
presumptive neural plate1.94e-1564
ecto-epithelium8.21e-1373
neural tube1.28e-1252
neural rod1.28e-1252
future spinal cord1.28e-1252
neural keel1.28e-1252
pre-chordal neural plate1.79e-1249
regional part of nervous system4.82e-1254
central nervous system1.48e-1173
nervous system1.87e-1175
brain4.06e-1147
future brain4.06e-1147
ectoderm-derived structure4.58e-1195
ectoderm4.58e-1195
presumptive ectoderm4.58e-1195
regional part of brain9.85e-1146
gray matter1.12e-1034
tube3.88e-10114
anterior neural tube4.16e-1040
regional part of forebrain1.37e-0939
forebrain1.37e-0939
future forebrain1.37e-0939
brain grey matter1.87e-0929
regional part of telencephalon1.87e-0929
telencephalon1.87e-0929
anatomical conduit2.07e-09122
cerebral cortex6.29e-0721
cerebral hemisphere6.29e-0721
pallium6.29e-0721


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}