Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1623

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:00, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1623_immature_migratory_CD14_xeroderma_Dendritic_CD19_mycosis



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:129350022..129350023,+p@chr11:129350022..129350023
+
Hg19::chr20:57085085..57085087,+p@chr20:57085085..57085087
+
Hg19::chr2:36960453..36960455,-p@chr2:36960453..36960455
-
Hg19::chr3:10517678..10517685,+p@chr3:10517678..10517685
+
Hg19::chr6:32605195..32605206,+p2@HLA-DQA1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor5.15e-9261
defensive cell3.20e-8848
phagocyte3.20e-8848
monopoietic cell1.58e-8559
monocyte1.58e-8559
monoblast1.58e-8559
promonocyte1.58e-8559
classical monocyte4.62e-8542
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.62e-8542
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell5.27e-8367
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.44e-7566
myeloid leukocyte2.97e-7272
leukocyte1.86e-62136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.88e-60120
myeloid cell1.78e-59108
common myeloid progenitor1.78e-59108
nongranular leukocyte4.84e-57115
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.40e-51161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.40e-51161
hematopoietic stem cell1.69e-48168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.69e-48168
hematopoietic cell1.78e-45177
stuff accumulating cell1.41e-4487
conventional dendritic cell5.78e-258
dendritic cell3.62e-2010
Langerhans cell1.65e-195
mesenchymal cell4.16e-17354
connective tissue cell1.49e-16361
motile cell1.33e-14386
immature conventional dendritic cell1.56e-145
common dendritic progenitor1.56e-145
intermediate monocyte5.70e-149
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte5.70e-149
multi fate stem cell3.24e-12427
somatic stem cell6.91e-12433
stem cell1.84e-11441
non-classical monocyte6.07e-113
CD14-low, CD16-positive monocyte6.07e-113
CD1a-positive Langerhans cell1.07e-082
immature CD1a-positive Langerhans cell1.07e-082
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow4.03e-7276
bone element3.55e-6682
immune system2.45e-6093
skeletal element1.81e-5990
hematopoietic system7.61e-5498
blood island7.61e-5498
skeletal system1.41e-52100
hemolymphoid system1.27e-50108
musculoskeletal system3.77e-29167
lateral plate mesoderm6.10e-21203
connective tissue8.49e-16371
mesoderm1.51e-11315
mesoderm-derived structure1.51e-11315
presumptive mesoderm1.51e-11315


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.