Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3356

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:35, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3356_Urothelial_cervical_tongue_Neutrophils_keratoacanthoma_uterus_Sebocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr13:20806422..20806431,-p5@GJB6
Hg19::chr13:20806445..20806465,-p1@GJB6
Hg19::chr1:17575584..17575598,+p1@PADI3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0000052citrulline metabolic process0.00953614299461548
GO:0019240citrulline biosynthetic process0.00953614299461548
GO:0018101peptidyl-citrulline biosynthetic process from peptidyl-arginine0.00953614299461548
GO:0004668protein-arginine deiminase activity0.00953614299461548
GO:0018195peptidyl-arginine modification0.00953614299461548
GO:0019794nonprotein amino acid metabolic process0.0123607570157109
GO:0016813hydrolase activity, acting on carbon-nitrogen (but not peptide) bonds, in linear amidines0.0158907641848528
GO:0005922connexon complex0.0163691689000625
GO:0042471ear morphogenesis0.0163691689000625
GO:0000051urea cycle intermediate metabolic process0.0163691689000625
GO:0005921gap junction0.0163691689000625
GO:0048839inner ear development0.0167693862056444
GO:0043583ear development0.017107839654105
GO:0014704intercalated disc0.0177757148183469
GO:0016324apical plasma membrane0.0239960942437855
GO:0045177apical part of cell0.0267705471660034
GO:0007423sensory organ development0.0267705471660034
GO:0048598embryonic morphogenesis0.0273384166545695
GO:0018193peptidyl-amino acid modification0.0332405229851315
GO:0050954sensory perception of mechanical stimulus0.0332405229851315
GO:0007605sensory perception of sound0.0332405229851315
GO:0044271nitrogen compound biosynthetic process0.0353274091037163
GO:0005911intercellular junction0.0397528999299051
GO:0016810hydrolase activity, acting on carbon-nitrogen (but not peptide) bonds0.0409514170360427
GO:0008285negative regulation of cell proliferation0.0475291114397334
GO:0009790embryonic development0.0477251786241198



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endo-epithelial cell4.25e-1143
respiratory epithelial cell2.93e-0813
endodermal cell4.37e-0859
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube2.00e-2557
neural rod2.00e-2557
future spinal cord2.00e-2557
neural keel2.00e-2557
anterior region of body1.47e-21129
craniocervical region1.47e-21129
brain2.30e-2169
future brain2.30e-2169
central nervous system3.07e-2182
regional part of brain2.07e-2059
head7.84e-20123
adult organism8.48e-20115
regional part of forebrain8.47e-1941
forebrain8.47e-1941
future forebrain8.47e-1941
anterior neural tube5.78e-1842
gray matter3.25e-1734
brain grey matter3.25e-1734
telencephalon4.10e-1734
neural plate5.60e-1786
presumptive neural plate5.60e-1786
regional part of telencephalon1.60e-1633
regional part of nervous system1.60e-1694
nervous system1.60e-1694
cerebral hemisphere2.60e-1632
neurectoderm7.90e-1690
ectoderm-derived structure1.43e-14169
ectoderm5.88e-14173
presumptive ectoderm5.88e-14173
pre-chordal neural plate3.47e-1361
regional part of cerebral cortex6.11e-1322
cerebral cortex8.65e-1325
pallium8.65e-1325
neocortex8.63e-1220
posterior neural tube1.08e-0815
chordal neural plate1.08e-0815
segmental subdivision of nervous system2.16e-0713
organ4.55e-07511
segmental subdivision of hindbrain7.53e-0712
hindbrain7.53e-0712
presumptive hindbrain7.53e-0712


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.