Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4117

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:55, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4117_Urothelial_small_Corneal_tubular_Smooth_cervical_pharyngeal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:110873370..110873379,-p3@MALL
Hg19::chr2:110873388..110873405,-p1@MALL
Hg19::chr2:110873422..110873434,-p2@MALL


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelium7.09e-25309
anatomical conduit9.43e-25241
cell layer1.79e-24312
anatomical system2.27e-22625
multi-cellular organism2.81e-22659
anatomical group4.80e-22626
anatomical cluster1.11e-21286
multi-tissue structure1.02e-20347
organism subdivision1.57e-19365
epithelial tube8.92e-19118
tube2.57e-17194
trunk2.90e-15216
endoderm-derived structure9.07e-15169
endoderm9.07e-15169
presumptive endoderm9.07e-15169
anatomical space4.05e-14104
mesenchyme4.33e-14238
entire embryonic mesenchyme4.33e-14238
organ part4.55e-14219
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm6.31e-1484
vessel7.43e-1469
embryonic structure1.16e-13605
developing anatomical structure1.16e-13605
embryo1.74e-13612
germ layer2.49e-13604
embryonic tissue2.49e-13604
presumptive structure2.49e-13604
epiblast (generic)2.49e-13604
vasculature5.02e-1379
vascular system5.02e-1379
blood vessel1.07e-1260
epithelial tube open at both ends1.07e-1260
blood vasculature1.07e-1260
vascular cord1.07e-1260
compound organ1.51e-1269
immaterial anatomical entity5.04e-12126
digestive system7.71e-12155
digestive tract7.71e-12155
primitive gut7.71e-12155
subdivision of digestive tract1.40e-11129
endodermal part of digestive tract1.40e-11129
simple squamous epithelium1.42e-1122
unilaminar epithelium4.36e-11138
renal system6.37e-1145
trunk region element6.53e-11107
organ7.28e-11511
urinary system structure1.08e-1044
squamous epithelium1.61e-1025
intermediate mesoderm3.19e-1037
endothelium6.43e-1018
blood vessel endothelium6.43e-1018
cardiovascular system endothelium6.43e-1018
subdivision of trunk1.19e-09113
epithelial fold5.61e-0951
circulatory system9.14e-09113
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure1.01e-08130
duct1.19e-0826
cardiovascular system2.80e-08110
anatomical cavity2.86e-0870
trunk mesenchyme4.06e-08143
body cavity precursor4.83e-0863
primordium6.21e-08168
nephron epithelium7.66e-0816
nephron7.66e-0816
uriniferous tubule7.66e-0816
metanephric mesenchyme7.66e-0816
nephrogenic mesenchyme7.66e-0816
excretory tube9.09e-0817
mesonephric epithelium9.09e-0817
mesonephric tubule9.09e-0817
nephric duct9.09e-0817
kidney epithelium9.09e-0817
renal duct9.09e-0817
mesonephric duct9.09e-0817
pronephric duct9.09e-0817
urogenital ridge1.11e-0720
thoracic segment of trunk1.12e-0752
artery1.38e-0742
arterial blood vessel1.38e-0742
arterial system1.38e-0742
mesonephros1.44e-0718
pronephros1.44e-0718
nephrogenic cord1.44e-0718


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0280021133119857
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326060606132738
ESR1#2099330.76860329615453.43136389821584e-050.00067795727235294
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0295070382698489



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.