Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3578

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:17, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr6:85137491..85137504,+p3@Emx1
Mm9::chr6:85137505..85137517,+p2@Emx1
Mm9::chr6:85137520..85137563,+p1@Emx1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neuron of cerebral cortex1.23e-086

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cerebral cortex7.35e-2621
cerebral hemisphere7.35e-2621
pallium7.35e-2621
regional part of cerebral cortex1.81e-2017
brain grey matter1.13e-1929
regional part of telencephalon1.13e-1929
telencephalon1.13e-1929
regional part of forebrain2.48e-1939
forebrain2.48e-1939
future forebrain2.48e-1939
anterior neural tube1.29e-1840
brain7.40e-1647
future brain7.40e-1647
gray matter1.24e-1534
regional part of brain5.28e-1546
occipital lobe7.83e-1410
visual cortex7.83e-1410
neocortex7.83e-1410
pre-chordal neural plate1.52e-1349
regional part of nervous system2.28e-1354
neural tube2.92e-1252
neural rod2.92e-1252
future spinal cord2.92e-1252
neural keel2.92e-1252
central nervous system3.31e-0973
nervous system1.01e-0875
neurectoderm2.07e-0864
neural plate2.07e-0864
presumptive neural plate2.07e-0864
kidney3.36e-0814
kidney mesenchyme3.36e-0814
upper urinary tract3.36e-0814
kidney rudiment3.36e-0814
kidney field3.36e-0814
Ammon's horn4.26e-087
lobe parts of cerebral cortex4.26e-087
hippocampal formation4.26e-087
limbic system4.26e-087
limbic lobe4.26e-087
ecto-epithelium4.18e-0773


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}