Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2275

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:10, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr19:7049103..7049172,+p4@Ppp1r14b
Mm9::chr4:48598120..48598140,+p5@Tmeff1
Mm9::chr6:122436142..122436198,-p4@Rimklb
Mm9::chr6:122436270..122436322,-p5@Rimklb


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004857enzyme inhibitor activity0.00253516577492826
GO:0004864protein phosphatase inhibitor activity0.0138721533729309
GO:0019212phosphatase inhibitor activity0.0138721533729309
GO:0019888protein phosphatase regulator activity0.0153256564215353
GO:0019208phosphatase regulator activity0.0153256564215353
GO:0004867serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity0.0367878587967453
GO:0004866endopeptidase inhibitor activity0.039834565154955
GO:0030414protease inhibitor activity0.039834565154955



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neurectoderm6.34e-2364
neural plate6.34e-2364
presumptive neural plate6.34e-2364
central nervous system7.96e-2273
nervous system1.82e-2175
ectoderm-derived structure2.27e-2195
ectoderm2.27e-2195
presumptive ectoderm2.27e-2195
ecto-epithelium4.51e-2073
regional part of nervous system2.55e-1954
pre-chordal neural plate2.95e-1949
neural tube1.25e-1852
neural rod1.25e-1852
future spinal cord1.25e-1852
neural keel1.25e-1852
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest6.18e-1892
gray matter7.01e-1634
anterior neural tube3.12e-1540
regional part of brain6.06e-1546
brain6.34e-1547
future brain6.34e-1547
regional part of forebrain9.62e-1539
forebrain9.62e-1539
future forebrain9.62e-1539
brain grey matter1.25e-1229
regional part of telencephalon1.25e-1229
telencephalon1.25e-1229
cerebral cortex2.53e-0821
cerebral hemisphere2.53e-0821
pallium2.53e-0821


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}