Coexpression cluster:C4234

Full id: C4234_occipital_colon_parietal_duodenum_brain_temporal_spinal

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:47572119..47572151,-	p1@ENST00000413185 p1@ENST00000448713 p1@ENST00000450550
Hg19::chr2:47572187..47572202,-	p2@ENST00000441997
Hg19::chr2:47572207..47572229,-	p1@ENST00000441997

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
neural cell	6.25e-07	25

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
central nervous system	3.68e-37	82
regional part of nervous system	4.81e-37	94
nervous system	4.81e-37	94
neural tube	1.06e-33	57
neural rod	1.06e-33	57
future spinal cord	1.06e-33	57
neural keel	1.06e-33	57
brain	6.16e-32	69
future brain	6.16e-32	69
adult organism	2.91e-31	115
neural plate	3.55e-30	86
presumptive neural plate	3.55e-30	86
regional part of brain	6.11e-28	59
neurectoderm	1.08e-27	90
anatomical conduit	1.01e-25	241
tube	1.35e-25	194
anterior neural tube	2.92e-24	42
regional part of forebrain	8.61e-24	41
forebrain	8.61e-24	41
future forebrain	8.61e-24	41
pre-chordal neural plate	6.95e-23	61
epithelium	1.28e-21	309
cell layer	3.90e-21	312
ectoderm-derived structure	9.84e-21	169
anterior region of body	1.05e-20	129
craniocervical region	1.05e-20	129
head	1.31e-20	123
anatomical cluster	3.27e-20	286
gray matter	7.79e-20	34
brain grey matter	7.79e-20	34
telencephalon	1.30e-19	34
ectoderm	1.54e-19	173
presumptive ectoderm	1.54e-19	173
multi-tissue structure	1.58e-19	347
regional part of telencephalon	3.79e-19	33
cerebral hemisphere	3.84e-18	32
organism subdivision	4.13e-18	365
organ part	3.23e-16	219
multi-cellular organism	1.30e-15	659
anatomical system	1.07e-14	625
cerebral cortex	1.33e-14	25
pallium	1.33e-14	25
anatomical group	1.68e-14	626
regional part of cerebral cortex	1.44e-13	22
embryo	4.60e-13	612
neocortex	1.27e-12	20
organ	1.88e-12	511
trunk region element	1.16e-11	107
embryonic structure	6.83e-11	605
developing anatomical structure	6.83e-11	605
germ layer	1.68e-10	604
embryonic tissue	1.68e-10	604
presumptive structure	1.68e-10	604
epiblast (generic)	1.68e-10	604
posterior neural tube	1.75e-10	15
chordal neural plate	1.75e-10	15
cavitated compound organ	7.20e-10	32
gastrointestinal system	4.62e-09	35
segmental subdivision of nervous system	6.10e-09	13
segmental subdivision of hindbrain	2.97e-08	12
hindbrain	2.97e-08	12
presumptive hindbrain	2.97e-08	12
intestine	3.64e-08	27
kidney	1.07e-07	27
kidney mesenchyme	1.07e-07	27
kidney rudiment	1.07e-07	27
kidney field	1.07e-07	27
abdomen element	1.25e-07	55
abdominal segment element	1.25e-07	55
compound organ	2.55e-07	69
renal system	2.80e-07	45
urinary system structure	3.35e-07	44
immaterial anatomical entity	4.10e-07	126
subdivision of digestive tract	5.95e-07	129
endodermal part of digestive tract	5.95e-07	129
organ segment	6.19e-07	97
brainstem	9.13e-07	8

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.