Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4634

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:51, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4634_melanoma_occipital_amygdala_temporal_postcentral_brain_insula



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:100808320..100808338,-p3@VGF
Hg19::chr7:100808394..100808436,-p2@VGF
Hg19::chr9:137967395..137967412,+p2@OLFM1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0001541ovarian follicle development0.0114354058803748
GO:0016524latrotoxin receptor activity0.0114354058803748
GO:0022601menstrual cycle phase0.0114354058803748
GO:0022602menstrual cycle process0.0114354058803748
GO:0008585female gonad development0.0114354058803748
GO:0046660female sex differentiation0.0114354058803748
GO:0046545development of primary female sexual characteristics0.0114354058803748
GO:0042698menstrual cycle0.0114354058803748
GO:0005184neuropeptide hormone activity0.0114354058803748
GO:0048731system development0.0117358057120867
GO:0008406gonad development0.0117358057120867
GO:0048608reproductive structure development0.0117358057120867
GO:0048856anatomical structure development0.0117358057120867
GO:0045137development of primary sexual characteristics0.0117358057120867
GO:0032504multicellular organism reproduction0.0117358057120867
GO:0048609reproductive process in a multicellular organism0.0117358057120867
GO:0005788endoplasmic reticulum lumen0.0117358057120867
GO:0007275multicellular organismal development0.0132863134972843
GO:0007548sex differentiation0.0132863134972843
GO:0003006reproductive developmental process0.013555761989149
GO:0032502developmental process0.0244911273801044
GO:0032501multicellular organismal process0.0293449752098031
GO:0005179hormone activity0.0293449752098031
GO:0008083growth factor activity0.0327702848493947
GO:0022414reproductive process0.0362342900506413
GO:0044444cytoplasmic part0.0362342900506413
GO:0019953sexual reproduction0.0362342900506413
GO:0031410cytoplasmic vesicle0.0461856130606856
GO:0031982vesicle0.0461856130606856



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism4.88e-45115
central nervous system1.24e-3182
regional part of nervous system2.24e-2994
nervous system2.24e-2994
neural tube1.37e-2857
neural rod1.37e-2857
future spinal cord1.37e-2857
neural keel1.37e-2857
anterior neural tube4.07e-2542
brain7.85e-2569
future brain7.85e-2569
regional part of forebrain1.52e-2441
forebrain1.52e-2441
future forebrain1.52e-2441
regional part of brain1.79e-2359
telencephalon2.27e-2034
neurectoderm2.45e-2090
gray matter4.94e-2034
brain grey matter4.94e-2034
cerebral hemisphere9.10e-2032
regional part of telencephalon1.27e-1933
neural plate1.11e-1886
presumptive neural plate1.11e-1886
regional part of cerebral cortex5.23e-1622
cerebral cortex3.83e-1525
pallium3.83e-1525
ectoderm6.72e-15173
presumptive ectoderm6.72e-15173
neocortex1.51e-1420
ectoderm-derived structure1.30e-13169
pre-chordal neural plate5.27e-1361
multi-cellular organism3.44e-11659
organ1.24e-10511
anterior region of body1.28e-10129
craniocervical region1.28e-10129
head1.48e-10123
embryo1.09e-07612
anatomical system1.22e-07625
anatomical group1.70e-07626
basal ganglion6.08e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis6.08e-079
aggregate regional part of brain6.08e-079
collection of basal ganglia6.08e-079
cerebral subcortex6.08e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.